Prof. Harry Targ, in his important piece “United States foreign policy: yesterday, today, and tomorrow,” (MR online, October 23, 2919), reminds us of the factional dispute among U.S. foreign policy elites over how to maintain the U.S. empire. On the one hand are the neoliberal global capitalists who favor military intervention, covert operations, regime change, strengthening NATO, thrusting China into the enemy vacuum and re-igniting the Cold War with Russia. All of this is concealed behind lofty rhetoric about humanitarianism, protecting human rights, promoting democracy, fighting terrorism and American exceptionalism. Their mantra is Madeleine Albright’s description of the United States as the world’s “one indispensable nation.”
On the other hand, as Targ explains, are the Trumpian, “America First” nationalist capitalists. This faction of the ruling class, while also supporting global dominance and a permanent war economy (military-related spending will consume 48 percent of the 2020 federal budget) favors trade restrictions, economic nationalism, building walls and anti-immigrant policies. Although Trump is inconsistent, bumbling and sometimes contradictory, he’s departed from the neocon’s agenda by making overtures to North Korea and Russia, voicing doubts about NATO as an expensive relic from the past that is being dangerously misused outside of Europe, not being afraid to speak bluntly to EU allies, frequently mentioning ending our “endless, ridiculous and costly wars,” asserting that the U.S. is badly overextended and saying “The job of our military is not to police the world.” I would add that Trump is also an “American exceptionalist” but ascribes a very different provincial meaning to the term, something closer to a crabbed provincialism, an insular “Shining City on a Hill,” surrounded by a moat.
This is a high stakes intra-ruling class struggle and neither side cares a fig about what’s best for the American people or those beyond our borders. At this point it’s impossible to know how it will play out but grasping the underlying dynamics explains much about current U.S. domestic and foreign policy. This understanding may, in turn, point toward how opponents of America’s oligarchic elites can most expeditiously use their time and energy....Dissident Voice
The Empire, Trump and Intra-Ruling Class Conflict
Gary Olson
12 comments:
A nuclear deterrent is a good investment. Don't make the mistake that Col. Gaddafi made.
"even the hint of getting out of the establishment interventionist status quo is terrifying to these generals,"
Warrior class is more apt to favor protracted low intensity conflict to avoid higher intensity conflict... tactical/strategic nuclear weapons are really a civilian weapon system that the military is ordered to deliver ... Trump is civilian Acquisitor class...
His "deals!" he keeps negotiating are an alternative to the low intensity conflict preferred by most of the Generals...
Acquisitor civilian Trump prefers protracted 'negotiations' to the Warrior general's protracted 'low intensity conflict'...
Trump ran on this and won ... so people should just fall in line and support him for his 4 year term and challenge him on this in the next election if they don't prefer his 'negotiation' strategy and instead want a return to more low intensity conflict...
Acquisitor civilian Trump πππππ
Why is this psycho still allowed to post on this site? [I note he's blocked me from commenting on said posts. Typical Trumper cowardice]
You are all biased anti-war so is this author probably... you’re not going to understand what is going on so you have to resort to your usual conspiracy theories...
It’s the “neo liberal conspiracy!” ... it’s “the zionists conspiracy!”.... it’s “the banksters!”.. it’s “the Zionist banksters!” ... it’s the “military industrial complex!”... it’s wtf etc...
It’s always some conspiracy with you lefty anti war nut jobs.... warfare is just another tool in the bag and always has been and always will be.. get over it...
The non biased anti war people (which is probably 95% of people leaving you losers as usual the odd out) have a difference of opinion on how best to protect this country and it’s citizens...
Trump favors his ‘negotiating’ backed up with overwhelming force (tactical nuclear weapon systems) vs the previous regimes which preferred low intensity conflict and “soft power” so as to avoid even the implied threat of nuclear weapons but results in continuous casualties...
Trump won.... Trump first thing ordered development of smaller more usable low yield tactical nuclear weapons and started negotiating, and withdrawing forces from low intensity confliction areas:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/09/us-to-loosen-nuclear-weapons-policy-and-develop-more-usable-warheads
The previous regimes political vestige doesn’t agree with Trumps approach... due to the threat of tactical nuclear weapons deployment if the “negotiations” fail.... which (hopefully) won’t happen...
It’s an honest disagreement in approach between people who are not biased anti-war and want to protect this country and it’s citizens ...... not one of your leftist anti war nut job conspiracy theories....
Take your loser whining to anti-war.com....
I have noted that the more the Trump White House unravels, the more hard core Trumpsters sound like schizophrenics who are off their meds.
Hey, Matt, this is what you're supporting: https://youtu.be/5w0kSkvusjI
Armchair warriors, chicken hawks. Yellow bellies!
Now I know there isn't a God!
Who needs God when you have Tulsi.
I like it!
Paula White made more sense than Matt when she started screaming and taking in tongues. Loved it!
Tactical nuclear weapons: makes strategy obsolete
Post a Comment