President Trump's refusal to accept U.S. Intelligence agencies assessments regarding Russian election interference is being heralded by mainstream as "defiant" a "blunder" and all manner of negative descriptors. Are these not the same intel agencies that insisted Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, hurling the world into 17 years of deadly, costly, useless war? Should these agencies and individuals not be questioned and challenged to provide unequivocal, documented evidence in such matters of importance? Is Donald Trump engaged in an epic battle with Military/Industrial/Technocratic enemies of the people of the United States? Psychological warfare expert, Shell Game author and Deep State whistleblower Scott Bennett joins me to analyze yesterday's historic Presidential summit.
Tuesday, July 17, 2018
Psychological Warfare Expert & Shell Game Whistle Blower Scott Bennett Analyzes Trump Putin Summit
Live right now. I know this show can be like watching paint dry but it's quite good at the moment. It's all about Russiagate,
President Trump's refusal to accept U.S. Intelligence agencies assessments regarding Russian election interference is being heralded by mainstream as "defiant" a "blunder" and all manner of negative descriptors. Are these not the same intel agencies that insisted Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, hurling the world into 17 years of deadly, costly, useless war? Should these agencies and individuals not be questioned and challenged to provide unequivocal, documented evidence in such matters of importance? Is Donald Trump engaged in an epic battle with Military/Industrial/Technocratic enemies of the people of the United States? Psychological warfare expert, Shell Game author and Deep State whistleblower Scott Bennett joins me to analyze yesterday's historic Presidential summit.
President Trump's refusal to accept U.S. Intelligence agencies assessments regarding Russian election interference is being heralded by mainstream as "defiant" a "blunder" and all manner of negative descriptors. Are these not the same intel agencies that insisted Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, hurling the world into 17 years of deadly, costly, useless war? Should these agencies and individuals not be questioned and challenged to provide unequivocal, documented evidence in such matters of importance? Is Donald Trump engaged in an epic battle with Military/Industrial/Technocratic enemies of the people of the United States? Psychological warfare expert, Shell Game author and Deep State whistleblower Scott Bennett joins me to analyze yesterday's historic Presidential summit.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
16 comments:
I'd like him to analyze this gem right here if he can:
Donald J. Trump
Verified account @realDonaldTrump
1h1 hour ago
While I had a great meeting with NATO, raising vast amounts of money, I had an even better meeting with Vladimir Putin of Russia. Sadly, it is not being reported that way - the Fake News is going Crazy!
F--kin' insane! (paraphrasing Noah)
“President Trump's refusal to accept U.S. Intelligence agencies assessments regarding Russian election interference…”
>Which “U.S. intelligence agencies”?
>What “assessments”? Can we read them?
>What is the nature of the alleged Russian “interference” or "meddling"? Did the Russians install Trump?
>What proof is there of any these claims?
Until someone can clearly and convincingly answer these questions, and present PROOF, Russia-gate will remain a hoax.
The whole thing is a distraction. Poverty, inequality, homelessness, and debt bondage get worse every day -- but let's talk about (alleged) "Russian meddling."
As I child, I considered adults to be smarter than me. Therefore I could not understand why millions of adults often decided to kill each other in war. I couldn’t grasp how someone could say, “Go and die!” and millions of adults would obey.
Now I see that this happens because most adults (not all) follow the herd, and live in a dream world, where they are barely lucid.
An example of this is the Russia-gate hysteria, in which the herd calls unproven, unverified, and uncorroborated accusations “facts.”
How dare a U.S. president de-escalate tensions with a nuclear power?
It’s disgraceful!
It’s embarrassing!
It’s outrageous!
Konrad, the Orange One this morning bragged how he's escalating tensions with a nuclear power.
"I had a great meeting with NATO, raising vast amounts of money..."
While I had a great meeting with NATO, raising vast amounts of money,
Translation: NATO is an anachronism. Russia is not the USSR. Russian is arming defensively and not offensively again NATO encroachment on its borders. If you want to defend yourself from hypothetical Russian attack you are welcome to pay for it yourselves, We will be happy to sell you US weapons.
I had an even better meeting with Vladimir Putin of Russia.
I am street-smart in the thoughts city in the world, where I rose to the top. Then I wupped the political establishment on both side and became president. I didn't get here by being gullible or naive and Putin was never in a position to put me here either. Get over it, losers. I won. You lost.
BTW, Putin filled me in on what Russian intel has on you.
Sadly, it is not being reported that way - the Fake News is going Crazy!
Other people are talking their book. Sore losers.
It’s amusing to watch Fox News. They have long supported Trump, but they support nuclear war even more.
Fox News anchor Neil Cavuto said Trump’s meeting with Putin was “disgusting” and “wrong.”
Fox News anchor Brit Hume called it “lame.”
Fox News reporter John Roberts said Trump “threw the United States under the bus.”
Fox host Brian Kilmeade said that Trump’s meeting was “insulting to past administrations.”
All these right-wing a**holes have allied with Democrats in pushing the Russia-gate hoax.
It’s as though the earth has passed through the tail of a weird comet that melted millions of people’s brains.
"I am street-smart in the thoughts city in the world" should be "I am street-smart in the toughest city in the world"
@ TOM HICKEY:
In response to a different post, you wrote, “BTW, what Trump did is just repeat what Nixon-Kissinger did in going to China to talk directly with Mao, in order to split China from the USSR.”
Exactly. China is a rising giant, and the Western Empire is terrified of it. Hence this move to cozy up to Russia. “Experts” in the corporate media outlets are too stupid to grasp this.
I once mentioned that I have lived in Japan, Singapore, and India. (The longest was India 2½ years). In all three places, English language newspapers were available, and I noticed that everyone in India and Southeast Asia was worried about China. That is, China was mentioned in almost all newspaper reporting on foreign policy issues.
China is a factor in every equation, since China is so powerful and influential. Average Westerners (most of them) don't realize this. But the Empire's leaders do, and they are afraid.
Russia is the largest country in the world but it only has a tiny population and the economy about the size ooh Italy. The idea that they are going to march into Europe and take it is ludicrous. Europe has massive population and huge well equipped army, and now thru have Eastern Europe too.
In addition, a majority of Germans want the US out. They feel that Germany has been occupied territory long enough.
Translation: NATO is an anachronism. Russia is not the USSR. Russian is arming defensively and not offensively again NATO encroachment on its borders. If you want to defend yourself from hypothetical Russian attack you are welcome to pay for it yourselves, We will be happy to sell you US weapons.
Tom, an example: The Greeks. Not one damn euro that Greece borrows to pay for its bloated military goes for a hypothetical Russian attack. Not one. Wishfully thinking, if the Turks were to permanently return from whence they came, the Mongolian Steppes, Greece's military spending would be a fraction of what it is now.
Another example: The French. You take away their military and what do they have? Notwithstanding their beautiful women, haute cuisine, and literature, they got nothing. They need their military to feel good -- that and to control their colonies in Africa; nothing to do with Russia.
What I am saying is that the Europeans aren't stupid (ball-less? Yes). They know damn well that no American general would risk nuclear retaliation by the Russians on the American homefront (including lousy states like Mississippi and Alabama) by coming to the Europe's defense. (Mind you, Americans admirals are another story; one too many port of calls if you know what I mean ;) )
I am street-smart in the thoughts city in the world,
Did New York city vote for Hillary or him?
... where I rose to the top.
On Daddy's shoulders, and not to mention Jeff Zucker giving him a tv reality clown show without which he'd remain an amateur clown.
Then I wupped the political establishment on both side and became president.
No mean feat when you consider he ran against the likes of Rubio et al. And he lost the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes/
I didn't get here by being gullible or naive
Indeed he got there by being the unashamedly and unapologetic racist that he is.
...and Putin was never in a position to put me here either. Get over it, losers. I won. You lost.
No, that would have been James Comey and his big mouth. And running against a wench. Yeah, that too helped.
Somewhat simplistic version of causation?
BTW, I am just sayin' what I think Trump's answer would be to your question.
And I don't think he would have any difficultly making the response seem frivolous.
I have already said that in my view DJT is an asshole, total and complete. But so are a lot of other people from Manhattan that have risen to the top in that environment, where you have to be world class to make to the top and stay there for any length of time.
In that competition, nice guys finish last.
nice guys finish last
That applies even more so to politics. Ruthless is the name of the game.
I was watching this video about what people in the street thought about Jeremy Cornyn and a lot of people thought he was a nice guy but not strong enough to be a prime minister, so the a significant section of the public tend to like war mongering, lying, cheating, egomaniac, ruthless, entirely selfish assholes. They like a bastard. We have no hope. But good, but very strong leaders do come along occasionally. And Jeremy Cornyn is looking stronger in the Any Questions now; he has found his feet and has gained confidence.
I hope he eventually gets the support to take on the Jewish lobby and this would make him look strong. He's got to be ruthless and purge them, but they at the moment are more powerful then him.
Post a Comment