Thursday, June 14, 2012

Record Number Of Households Spending More Than Half Of Income On Housing

Affordable housing is scarcer than ever.
A record 20.2 million American households spent more than half of their incomes on housing in 2010, according to a new study by the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University released on Thursday. That is a 13 percent increase from 2007, and a 46 percent increase from 2001, according to the study. The report examined both renters and homeowners.
Renters are shouldering much of the burden of higher housing costs. Twenty-seven percent of all renters spent more than half of their incomes on housing in 2010, more than twice the share of homeowners, according to the study.
But some homeowners are not immune either. The number of homeowners that were forced to spend more than half of their incomes on housing in 2010 rose by more than 350,000 from 2007, according to the study. Many of them were trapped in costly mortgages that they could not refinance.
In spite of record low home prices and mortgage interest rates, the study found that housing is now more expensive because many homeowners are locked into expensive mortgages, while renters are forced to pay higher rents as some with bad credit have been shut out of the housing market. Meanwhile, the median American household's income and net worth plunged during the same time period, respectively down 8 percent and 39 percent, according to a recent Federal Reserve report.
Read it at Huffington Post | Money
Housing Costs: Record Number Of Households Spending More Than Half Of Income On Housing
by Bonnie Kavoussi

Percentage of income spent on housing is a number to watch. Like private debt, when it is becoming increasingly elevated above the norm, its a signal that the economy is heading for a cliff. Both debt service and housing expenses add to the monthly nut. It used to be "keep your eye on the ball," now it's "watch the nut."

3 comments:

Mike Norman said...

YEah, and all their money is going to landlords who, in most cases, did nothing to create the very capital they're extracting rents from. This sort of income should be taxed to hell. Just my opinion.

Unforgiven said...

So, what's the alternative to landlords? Seems like somebody has to own the property...

Clonal said...

I remember a time when the benchmark figure was 10% - then that benchmark became 25% and then 33% and then ........

and of course neither Government Policy nor the FIRE sector had anything to do with it - it just reflected the increasing costs of land and building costs! ;-)