Think "economics profession" when reading it. It is a good demonstration of why the historical method is superior to the naturalistic one in social subjects.
The Philosopher's Stone
GRABER AND WENGROW YET AGAIN
Robert Paul Wolff | Professor Emeritus, University of Massachusetts Amherst
The Philosopher's Stone
GRABER AND WENGROW YET AGAIN
Robert Paul Wolff | Professor Emeritus, University of Massachusetts Amherst
2 comments:
Love the comment, Tom -- sure to make Mr. Franko at the mouth -- because it is true. I don't think the two approaches need necessarily conflict, though!
I don't think the two approaches need necessarily conflict, though!
I don't think so either. They are complementary. The trick is distinguishing where each applies.
The naturalistic approach is preferable when applicable, but that is not always and everywhere.
Post a Comment