I read an August 2020 Bank of England Staff Working Paper (No.883) – Does quantitative easing boost bank lending to the real economy or cause other bank asset reallocation? The case of the UK – recently, which investigates whether the large bond-buying program of the Bank stimulates bank lending. They find that there was no stimulus to lending. Which would only be a surprise if one thought that mainstream monetary economics had anything useful to say. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) economists were not at all surprised by this finding.The reality is that the lack of bank lending during the GFC had nothing to do with a liquidity shortfall within the banking sector. It had all to do with a lack of credit-worthy borrowers – which should tell you that bank reserves do not constrain bank lending. The fact that mainstream institutions such as the Bank of England are now publishing this sort of research, which undermines the mainstream theory is the interesting fact.
Bill Mitchell – billy blog
Bank of England finds QE did not increase bank lending: who would have thoughtBill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
5 comments:
“ which should tell you that bank reserves do not constrain bank lending.”
False… completely 100% false…
The Fed has created a new 1.5T RRP facility to accrue reserve balances away from depositories so as not to constrain bank credit by increasing system reserve assets…
Matt's correct. Reserves factor into leverage ratios, which can cause higher capital requirements or slower asset growth (i.e. loans) when reserves increase.
And this:
“ the lack of bank lending during the GFC had nothing to do with a liquidity shortfall within the banking sector. It had all to do with a lack of credit-worthy borrowers ”
Lehman was trying to get credit backed by 100% UST securities as collateral so how could they not be a “credit worthy borrower”? They couldn’t get credit because system reserves were increased and credit was constrained,,,
As Mike explained a few times on his videos, they can always modify or not enforce the leverage ratio if they need to. They already have.
But that’s not what they did in 2008 …. Bill’s statement is false…
Post a Comment