It’s Wednesday and so I have a few items to discuss followed by some music. Many readers have E-mailed me asking about last week’s decision by the OPEC+ cartel to cut production of crude oil by 1.66 million barrels per day. Taken together with the previous cuts (2 millions barrels per day) in October, this pushed the price of oil up within a day or so back over $US80 per day. Many commentators immediately announced this would drive inflation back up and force central banks to go harder on interest rates. I disagree with those assessments. When analysing cartel behaviour (and OPEC+ is such an organisation), one has to distinguish between price stability and price gouging exercises. As I explain below, I believe OPEC+ to be engaged in a price stabilising activity in the face of anticipated reductions in global demand for crude oil. The risk is that demand will fall further than the producers expect and they will have to make further cuts. But even if the new price level holds, that won’t really trigger a new bout of accelerating inflation.Cartel pricing as an economic indicator based on supplier expectations. Is a slowdown in the growth of the global economy in the offing?
William Mitchell — Modern Monetary Theory
Are the OPEC production cuts a problem?
Bill Mitchell | Professor in Economics and Director of the Centre of Full Employment and Equity (CofFEE), at University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia
6 comments:
OPEC should give away their oil for free. Problem solved.
How about We should just kill them and go take the oil?
And it’s knda funny to read Bill making excuses for Saudi…
😂
Bill must be a LIVGolf fan…
When Washington does business with the Saudis, human rights groups object.
When Beijing does business with the head-choppers, it's a celebration of multi-polarity.
Strange cheerleading going on...
Right… brings out the biases…
Post a Comment