Showing posts with label military strategy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label military strategy. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 18, 2018

Andrei Martyanov — What Is This All About (INF Treaty, Again).

… the main task today remains to prevent a global war, which is increasingly seen in the US by some as the only way to avoid a day of reckoning. Needless to say, this war is seen as possible in the US by people who have zero knowledge and qualifications in serious military issues and it is not a bad idea to keep reminding all kinds of neocon trash which runs Empire today from their comfy country clubs and offices that many of them will have their own personal conventional 3M14 or X-101 with their names on them if they decide to push for the real deal.
Reminiscence of the Future
What Is This All About (INF Treaty, Again).
Andrei Martyanov

See also

Fort Russ News
Putin: New Russian Weapons Will Make Aggressors Think Before Opening Their Mouths

US Admits Inability to Resist Russian Hypersonic Weapons

Just How Useless Are US Air Carriers Compared To Russian And Chinese Might
Joaquin Flores

See also

Military Times
Think tank [Atlantic Council]: NATO must prepare to counter a rapid Russia invasion in Europe
MiG-31 Jets Armed With Kinzhal Hypersonic Missiles Carried Out 89 Patrols Over Caspian And Black Seas

See also

Fort Russ News
MAJOR: Lavrov Denounces Poroshenko’s Plans to Attack Crimea
Joaquin Flores











Monday, January 15, 2018

Asia Times — Two missiles could blow up Three Gorges: strategist


How strategists think.
Taiwan should buy 1,000 missiles to seal off China's central and southeastern provinces in the event of war, said the scholar.
Why 1000 when two supposedly would do the job. Swarm tactics.

Also good for business.

Asia Times
Two missiles could blow up Three Gorges: strategist

Counterpoint. Signs of growing universalism in Europe, although  a lot of "nationalists" won't be happy even though she is first generation Belgian, born in Antwerp of a Chinese father and Filipina mother.

Filipino-Chinese Angeline Flor Pua crowned Miss Belgium

On the other hand,
Strategically placed at the entrance to the Red Sea, Djibouti is home to more foreign bases than any other country.
Politico
The Coming Wars
Bruno Maçães, a former Europe minister for Portugal, is a senior adviser at Flint Global in London and a nonresident senior fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington.

Bizarre.

Fort Russ
Reports: The Americans failed to poison Putin
EG.ru - translated by Inessa Sinchougova

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed — ISIS wants to destroy the 'grey zone'. Here's how we defend it


ISIS versus Western strategy. ISIS understands its enemy, while the West does not. The West needs to wise up.

Open Democracy
ISIS wants to destroy the 'grey zone'. Here's how we defend it
Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed
crossposted at Raging Bull-Shit

Friday, July 3, 2015

Marcus Weisgerber — Dempsey to Pentagon: Prepare For the Never-Ending War

The U.S. military needs to reorganize itself and prepare for war that has no end in sight with militant groups, such as the Islamic State, and nations that use proxies to fight on their behalf, America's top general warned Wednesday.
In what is likely his last significant strategy direction before retiring this summer, Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at the Pentagon that "global disorder has trended upward while some of our comparative advantages have begun to erode," since 2011, the last update to the National Military Strategy.
"We are more likely to face prolonged campaigns than conflicts that are resolved quickly… that control of escalation is becoming more difficult and more important… and that as a hedge against unpredictability with reduced resources, we may have to adjust our
In what is likely his last significant strategy direction before retiring this summer, Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at the Pentagon that "global disorder has trended upward while some of our comparative advantages have begun to erode," since 2011, the last update to the National Military Strategy.
"We are more likely to face prolonged campaigns than conflicts that are resolved quickly… that control of escalation is becoming more difficult and more important… and that as a hedge against unpredictability with reduced resources, we may have to adjust our global posture,” Dempsey writes in the new military strategy.
Dempsey, the president’s senior military advisor, criticizes Russia, Iran, North Korea, and China for aggressive military actions and warns that the rapidly changing global security environment might force the military to reorganize as it prepares for a busy future....
The military will continue its pivot to the Pacific, Dempsey writes, but its presence in Europe, the Middle East, Latin America, and Africa will evolve. The military must remain “globally engaged to shape the security environment,” he said.
If this sounds like historical imperial overreach, it is.

National Journal
Dempsey to Pentagon: Prepare For the Never-Ending War
Marcus Weisgerber, Defense One

Saturday, March 28, 2015

Chuck Spinney — The Folly of Machine Warfare


Military analysts Chuck Spinney reviews Andrew Cockburn's Kill Chain. Technological warfare is not all that it's cracked up to be.

Counterpunch
The Folly of Machine Warfare
Franklin C. Spinney, former Pentagon military analyst

Thursday, January 22, 2015

Francis P. Sempa — Is China Bidding for the Heartland?


Beijing doesn’t have to choose between land and sea predominance. It could have both.

The Diplomat
Is China Bidding for the Heartland?
Francis P. Sempa | Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, an adjunct professor of political science at Wilkes University, and a contributing editor to American Diplomacy

Saturday, December 20, 2014

Paul McHale — Key to defeating ISIS is ideas, not arms

There is a military term of art that has deep significance in our fight against ISIS. It captures the idea that there is an identifiable source of enemy power that, if successfully attacked, will lead to our enemy's strategic defeat. That enemy strength (and potential vulnerability) is called their "center of gravity."
This is called "winning the hearts and minds of the people." It's why the US was ignominiously defeated in Vietnam by North Vietnamese Viet Cong General Vo Nguyen Giap, who first defeated the French at Dien Bien Phu in 1954, driving France from Indochina and resulting in communist North and "free" South Vietnam. I was an officer in the US Naval Reserve on active duty 1964-1967 at which time I read the work of French journalist Bernard Fall describing what had happened. After reading Fall, I realized that the US would fall into the same trap and it did, although it took a decade more to unfold with untold destruction on both sides.

However, "winning the hearts and minds of the people" is not just a strategy. The people actually have to be convinced that they matter, and, of course, they didn't. They were just pawns in the great game that really didn't have that much to do with the Vietnamese people at all.
In my judgment, ISIS can be contained and then destroyed, but that goal will not be achieved by brute military power. ISIS' center of gravity exists far beyond the battlefield. It exists in the hearts, minds and aspirations of the young men and women who are drawn to the cause of violent Islamic extremism. Killing ISIS fighters at the front end of the combatant pipeline has value - but closing the pipeline of ISIS recruiting is the real center of gravity.
Right. ISIS is even a greater threat than Al Qaeda since it has declared the Caliphate as a rallying point for the reestablishment of a Sunni state in MENA under Islamic law. This has the potential for going viral among radicalized Sunni youth in the Islamic countries, as well as other countries. This is an extremely powerful idea and countering with another idea that more powerful is much easier said that done.
Throughout U.S. history, our men and women in uniform have fought and died for a noble cause: the unwavering defense of individual freedom. They understood - often when our politicians did not - that there was something at stake that transcended self-interest. Yes, to be effective, military forces need to be well-trained and equipped. And they need to be well-led. But most important, they need to believe that they are fighting for something worthy of their blood and sacrifice.…
This is the mindset I had when I entered the US military. I was disabused of it while in the military and came to realize that I was being betrayed by this line of propaganda to motivate the troops. The idea that the US was fighting for individual liberty in a far away place like Vietnam, which had little to do with the national interest was simply not believable on reflection, and on inspection it became obvious that this was not about freedom, ours or theirs, but about empire and those who control it.

McClatchyDC
Key to defeating ISIS is ideas, not arms
Paul McHale, The Philadelphia Inquirer, December 15, 2014
Paul McHale is a former member of Congress (1993-99), assistant secretary of defense (2003-09) and a retired Marine colonel with 33 years of active and reserve service.
Unfortunately, he is also clueless. He is taking about convincing Islamic youth to adopt American values, when these value are clearly against everything in which they believe. It's like trying to convince Christian fundamentalists to accept liberal values like abortion on demand and same sex marriage because indivdual freedom.

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/12/15/250019_key-to-defeating-isis-is-ideas.html?rh=1#storylink=cpy


Saturday, May 25, 2013

Fabius Maximus — Update about one of the seldom-discussed trends shaping our world: 4GW

Summary: One of the great stories of 21st century looks to be the conflict between nations using conventional military methods (2GW and 3GW), and forces using 4GW. So far the latter are winning almost every time. America’s inability to adapt to this new world, part of our larger #FailureToLearn, is another strike against the Second Republic (that built on the Constitution). Here’s a brief status report on the war, concluding with a new article by William Lind, our Thucydides.
Update about one of the seldom-discussed trends shaping our world: 4GW
Fabius Maximus