Before Scalia’s death, Cruz had repeatedly made the Supreme Court a centerpiece of his campaign, promising to create the most conservative bench in history if elected. He has said that changing the ideological makeup of the Supreme Court would be a huge priority for him as president — and that he would “spend whatever political capital is necessary” to appoint the most reliably conservative justices he could find.
“We are one justice away from the Supreme Court concluding that nobody in this room and no American has an individual right to keep and bear arms,” Cruz told a packed town hall meeting in Iowa last month. “We are one justice away from the Supreme Court striking down every restriction on abortion, and mandating unlimited abortion on demand, up until the time of birth, partial birth, with taxpayer funding, and no parental notification whatsoever. We are one justice away from the Supreme Court ordering veterans memorials torn down all over this country if they contain any acknowledgement of God Almighty.”Think Progress
After Scalia Death, Ted Cruz Says 2016 Election Should Be ‘A Referendum On The Supreme Court’
Emily Atkin
3 comments:
Trump could offer the nomination up to Evangelicals... not his bag anyway...
Aha! I knew it. They will be calling for court packing next.
Both parties would love for the 2016 election to be a referendum on SCOTUS because SCOTUS is mostly about social issues.
SCOTUS cannot end the wars. SCOTUS cannot stimulate the economy. SCOTUS cannot reduce inequality. And so forth.
At best, SCOTUS could in theory roll back the police state, but in reality there is zero chance that either pro-police state party will nominate a justice who does not support the police state. Even Bernie supports the presidential power to assassinate people.
Rather than a boon to democracy, I view the SCOTUS issue as a distraction.
Post a Comment