An economics, investment, trading and policy blog with a focus on Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). We seek the truth, avoid the mainstream and are virulently anti-neoliberalism.
ET: Yes, ability to create a currency does not mean ability to command resources because there may not be a demand for the currency. That is where tax liabilities and other dues owed to the government become important (cf. the chartalist theory of money, a component of MMT). That’s also why taxes, monetary creation and bond issuance are not conceptualized by MMT as alternative financing means but rather as complementary. [bold added]
Then why support privileges* for banks which increase demand for bank deposits by decreasing demand for fiat?
*Privileges such as exclusive access to inherently risk-free accounts at the Central Bank.
2 comments:
ET: Yes, ability to create a currency does not mean ability to command resources because there may not be a demand for the currency. That is where tax liabilities and other dues owed to the government become important (cf. the chartalist theory of money, a component of MMT). That’s also why taxes, monetary creation and bond issuance are not conceptualized by MMT as alternative financing means but rather as complementary. [bold added]
Then why support privileges* for banks which increase demand for bank deposits by decreasing demand for fiat?
*Privileges such as exclusive access to inherently risk-free accounts at the Central Bank.
I left a comment after the Andolfatto article.
Post a Comment