There’s nothing wrong with people publishing research that turns out to be mistaken. No problem at all. Sometimes you can’t know a path is a dead end until you walk down it.
The problem is not (necessarily) with the original study. The problem is with a scientific culture that doesn’t have a good way of letting go of these mistakes. Like a harbor clotted with sunken vessels....
Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
“Like a harbor clotted with sunken vessels”: update
Andrew Gelman | Professor of Statistics and Political Science and Director of the Applied Statistics Center, Columbia University
Andrew Gelman | Professor of Statistics and Political Science and Director of the Applied Statistics Center, Columbia University
3 comments:
“ a scientific culture that doesn’t have a good way of letting go of these mistakes.”
LOL thats what they train in the Art degree community not Science...
It’s textbook Socrates 101... adamantly argue your thesis and never make an adjustment (katharsis)...
“ argue your thesis and never make an adjustment ”
Lol! When will you make adjustments to your art degree thesis based on envy? Never!
What a moron.
Why would I adjust it? It’s never been wrong...
Post a Comment