George Eliason — Why Crowdstrike’s Russian Hacking Story Fell Apart 2 — The DNI Report Faked Sources

The only thread that holds the DNI report together at first glance is the false testimony and fake evidence Crowdstrike and Dmitri Alperovitch provided to the FBI and other agencies involved. When you look at the evidence presented and the sources it becomes evident that the Russian hack story doesn’t stand up against Crowdstrike’s own facts.

By examining facts, timelines, and sources needed for the DNI report, the only conclusion is the DNI report is strictly political. Because of this Craig Murray- Julian Assange’s story showing the emails were leaked is the only version of the story that stands. The facts on hand show criminality and negligence on the part of Crowdstrike, the FBI, and the DNI.…

More on US intelligence relying on Crowdstrike, Dimitri Alperovitch, and the Ukrainian connection through the Chalupa family, linked to Hillary Clinton.

Washington's Blog
Why Crowdstrike’s Russian Hacking Story Fell Apart 2 — The DNI Report Faked Sources

George Eliason

(George Eliason lives in Ukraine.)

Why Crowdstrike’s Russian Hacking Story Fell Apart — Say Hello to Fancy Bear (Jan 3) was part 1

Russia Hacking the Election the Inside Story ( Dec 21) was the intro.

George Eliason — Russia Hacking the Election the Inside Story

We know by now that Alexandra Chalupa was the person in charge of the Democratic National Committee’s “ethnic outreach” efforts. According to Yahoo News, she was one of the 16 people that shaped the national election in 2016. In the Yahoo story journalist Michael Isikoff described her as a normal person that shaped history.

Alexandra Chalupa has been the voice behind saying Russia illegally interfered with the election. And according to her story, she was almost hacked repeatedly while researching Paul Manafort. The Democrats say this caused the Clinton defeat. No one explained why “researching” Paul Manafort, an American, would excite Russian attention.

Strangely, every article about her neglects to mention that Chalupa and her family are not Democrats as suggested. Instead they are admitted ultra-nationalists bent on sending America to war with Russia by any means possible. And they are vocal about it.

None of the articles connect the fact that the Clinton loss is personal for the Chalupa family. At least 2 of them were going to the White House as advisors and cabinet members….

The Ukrainian nationalist connection. Backgrounder on OUN Bandera.

Washington's Blog
Russia Hacking the Election the Inside Story
George Eliason, an American journalist living in Ukraine