Showing posts with label cancer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cancer. Show all posts

Friday, September 26, 2014

What's The Dividing Line Between Cultural Evolution & Terminal Cancer?

   (Commentary posted by Roger Erickson.)

"The power of willful ignorance can never be overstated, because people are prepared to look the other way and believe anything." 
John Leonard (electrician's union)
Yes, and what do we do about it?* Well, doesn't that quickly force us to ask what culture is? You don't have to be able to state an answer to have culture, but it sure might help us to do so if we want to extend present Human Culture.




So much has been discovered, documented - and ignored - about diverse forms of culture that we are in dire need of summarizing, so we can get to the self-survival question of what to do next. How do we extend what we have?

Let's try one, terse summary of what we do have, and what we know about the process of building and extending culture.

aka,

1) Data is meaningless w/o context.

2) Construction of context = Interpretation of data = part of culture = outcomes from habits.

3) It takes LAYERS OF SUB-CULTURE to tune any & all cultural components w asynchronous & increasingly shorter time constants (i.e., cultural agility = adaptive rate).

4) Which is why we need progressively MORE self-governance infrastructure, just to maintain - let alone increase - net agility of a system growing in size &/or capability.
(Resiliency is NOT efficiency. Tuning to do ONE task involves dumbing down capabilities. Retaining ability of a growing system to respond to ANY contingency requires continuously added inter-dependencies among existing and emerging infrastructure components.)
5) Ergo.
Cost-of-coordination [C-O-C] is always the highest cost, by far. (Shewhart)
Return-on-total-coordination [R-O-TC] is the ONLY return worth chasing.
(Logic: R-O-TC = only return > C-O-C)
So what is the dividing line between evolution & terminal cancer?
Tuning return-on-coordination out of uncoordinated growth?

We're at another fork in that path. Since most paths are terminal, let's focus on taking the road less traveled.

It might also help to remind students and all citizens that culture didn't start with humans, or even with amoebas, or even with inorganic chemistry ...




... so that it doesn't come as a shock if they finally learn that culture will definitely not end with anything we can currently imagine.


Really, we're left with only a rather simple question.

How do we both successfully launch, and then stay out of the way of our own grandchildren, and the 7th generation yet unborn?

How that question is interpreted is entirely dependent upon the transition rate between the context which the group mind of our current electorate holds today, and the context perceived by our survivors a few generations out.

If we wisely choose which directions of change to accelerate, there will be more of those survivors, racing on sooner to new futures.

If we choose poorly, more of our descendants will suffer terminal consequences, and their journey to the future will be slowed.

Which outcome do we desire?
(very apt cartoon here, by Beatrice the Biologist; part of how brains work)

An inexperienced, out of practice cultural group-brain tends to work the same way.

_____________

Notice I didn't mention coincidental trivialities like economics, accounting, or regulation. Those are all standardized parts of cultural plumbing, to build upon, not constrain with.


Thursday, September 18, 2014

CEO Compensation Still "Out Of Control?" - Who's Supposed To Be In Control, For What Public Purpose? And Why Aren't They In Control?

   (Commentary posted by Roger Erickson.)




And, most importantly, how do we the people regain control?

Bill Mitchell writes:
CEO pay still out of control
Minus reception of the appropriate feedback from the "controlling" interdependencies, any system metric is "out of control."

Which feedback channels could/would/should be exerting the needed control ... and why aren't they operating as needed?

The more I read about current political-economics, the more it reminds me of cancer biology.

Instead of discussing only the high-friction, political-economic analogs of cultural chemo-therapy, shouldn't we be educating all citizens on what practices correspond to known political-economic onco-genes and carcinogens? And the best political-economic anti-oxidants that help us practice prevention?

Contrary to what some might think, a little political-economic sunlight is the best policy anti-oxidant, not just the best policy anti-septic.

Covering up, and smearing the political-economic sunscreen sure seems to be a self-defeating policy. It's produced an electorate with a severe Vitamin-Democracy deficiency.