Showing posts with label constitutional crisis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label constitutional crisis. Show all posts

Friday, May 12, 2017

Gaius Publius — Trump – A Nation in Crisis, Again

One last thought. This country has had a constitutional crisis every 70 years, after which the government restructured itself. In effect, we have been ruled by three Constitutions, not just one, each producing, in practice, very different governments and societies. We’re rapidly producing a crisis that will produce a fourth.
In order, our constitutional crises are:
  •  1789, the Revolutionary War and transition from colony to slave-holding republic.
  • 1865, the Civil War and transition from divided slave-holding nation with two competing economies to united freed-slave state. This change took down the Southern agricultural aristocracy (by depriving it of the nearly free labor it depended on); made the Northern industrial economy nationally ascendant; and put us firmly on the path to first-world industrial powerhouse.
  • 1933, the Great Depression and transition from a light-handed pro-business government to a heavy-handed regulatory state.
  • And now, this.
What will the next American Constitution look like? Turkey’s and Hungary’s, with their dictators and single-party governments wrapped in the old constitutional forms? A naked kleptocracy, where constitutional forms are simply ignored, like those in many third-world countries? A state in which forms are observed but the hand with real power belongs mainly to the “security” apparatus? In many countries, coups by segments of the elite, blatant or covert, are welcomed as correctives and tacitly approved (another way constitutions are revised without being rewritten).
If Trump is not successfully impeached, and it looks for now like he won’t be, our government as practiced will once more dramatically change, as it did when Bush’s crimes were not addressed, and Obama’s after him (never forget that targeted assassination is an innovation Obama made lawful).
But whatever happens next, whether Trump is impeached or not, I think we’ve already been changed as a nation forever by what’s already led to this moment. After all, in 2016 the nation wanted someone like Sanders to be president, wanted an agent of change, and look what it got. This is in fact our second failed attempt this century at change that makes our lives better.
I don’t think that point’s been lost on anyone. We’re in transition no matter what happens to Trump. Transition to what, we’ll have to find out later.
And something else to consider. The last three times the government fundamentally changed, we got lucky. We found leaders — Washington, Lincoln, Roosevelt — up to the task, in chaotic and troubling times, of steering an altered ship to calmer water and a safer port.
Will we get lucky once more? We can only hope.
Leaving the details aside, I think that the hypothesis that America is now in another of its recurrent phase traditions is likely correct.

I would also say that like the transition from a British colony to an independent constitutional republic, and the Great Depression, but unlike the Civil War, this phase transition is part of a global realignment.

I expect this to take at least a decade to work out globally and perhaps a generation or more if one takes the onset to be 9/11, or the financial crisis and Great Recession.

A new world is being born, and America will also look quite different after the dust finally settles some time in the future.

This is only marginally about the people and events involved in the various countries. It is a transition of moments in the dialectical progression of history.

The force the previous moment is waning and a new moment is gather force, but it is difficult to make out its outlines at present other than to speculate that Western dominance is waning.

Perhaps the Great Divergence that began at the beginning of the 16th century is transforming into the Great Convergence. This would be my guess.

Naked Capitalism
Gaius Publius: Trump – A Nation in Crisis, Again
Yves Smith

Monday, July 13, 2015

Michael Perelman — Mary Fallon and me


Political humor.

This is a bit unsettling though. The US embroiled in a constitutional crisis that is bubbling up.

Unsettling Economics
Mary Fallon and me
Michael Perelman | Professor of Economics at California State University, Chico

Friday, May 15, 2015

William R. Polk — Losing the American Republic

Decades of letting neocons dictate a hawkish foreign policy have put the American Republic in profound danger, just as presidents from George Washington to Dwight Eisenhower predicted, warnings that Americans must finally take to heart, says ex-U.S. diplomat William R. Polk.
The American republic is already gone. The conversation needs to be about recovering it, or the great American experiment is over. The republic has become an empire ruled by the deep state and plutocracy.

A long, sad story, this is the first of two parts in which William Polk relates the gory details and lots of fascinating background. These are lessons that George Washington taught and Dwight Eisenhower expanded on. These are also lessons the US should have learned from the bitter experience of humiliating defeat in Vietnam. But the leadership has not listened nor has it learned.

Consortium News
Losing the American Republic
William R. Polk

See also
Jeb Bush’s stumbling start to his presidential bid has refocused attention on Official Washington’s favorite excuse for the illegal, aggressive and disastrous war in Iraq – that it was just a case of “bad intelligence.” But that isn’t what the real history shows, as ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern recalls.
Ray McGovern reminds us just how bad it was.

The Phony ‘Bad Intel’ Defense on Iraq
Ray McGovern

Saturday, January 17, 2015

DSWright — White House Approved CIA Hacking Of Senate Computers

According to a report by the CIA Inspector General, the White House was informed of the CIA’s plan to hack US Senate computers to discover what was going to be in the Senate Torture Report. CIA Director John Brennan met with White House chief of staff Denis McDonough then ordered CIA employees to “use whatever means necessary” to find out what Senate investigators knew. 
Given the White House’s role in the illegal hacking of Senate computers it becomes obvious why the Justice Department headed by President Obama-appointed Attorney General Eric Holder is not likely to bring charges against the CIA – charges against the CIA could lead back to the White House. 
The specific content of the conversation between Brennan and McDonough is not disclosed but after the conversation Brennan instructed his subordinates at the CIA to trash the Constitution and engage in espionage activity against the US Senate.

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

BillMoyers.com — Transcript: Senator Dianne Feinstein Accuses CIA of Violating US Constitution


Like it says, the transcript.

BillMoyers.com

Dan Froomkin — CIA Search of Congressional Computer Sparks Constitutional Crisis

Intelligence Committee chair Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), in a floor speech (transcript; video) that Judiciary Committee chair Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) immediately called the most important he had heard in his career, said the CIA had searched through computers belonging to staff members investigating the agency’s role in torturing detainees, and had then leveled false charges against her staff in an attempt to intimidate them.
“I have grave concerns that the CIA’s search may well have violated the separation of powers principle embodied in the United States Constitution, including the speech and debate clause,” she said. “It may have undermined the constitutional framework essential to effective congressional oversight of intelligence activities or any other government function.”
She concluded: “The recent actions that I have just laid out make this a defining moment for the oversight of our intelligence community. How Congress responds and how this is resolved will show whether the Intelligence Committee can be effective in monitoring and investigating our nation’s intelligence activities, or whether our work can be thwarted by those we oversee. I believe it is critical that the committee and the Senate reaffirm our oversight role and our independence under the Constitution of the United States.”
She also accused the CIA of obstructing her committee’s torture inquiry in general, and of disputing findings that its own internal inquiry had substantiated.
The Intercept
CIA Search of Congressional Computer Sparks Constitutional Crisis
Dan Froomkin

Juicy.

It's also dicey for President Obama. If he does not respond correctly to this, he could see himself successfully impeached for it and removed from office, if the GOP retakes the Senate next year. The Right is very anxious to impeach this president on any suitable pretext of wrongdoing. However, the fact that proceedings might expose the involvement of the Bush Administration in an illegal torture program would make it a touch choice for them.

White House spokesman Jay Carney, meanwhile, said “The president has great confidence in John Brennan and confidence in our intelligence community and in our professionals at the CIA.”

Collision course.

Personally, I would like to see all involved in torture or approving it in a dock at the Hague going all the way back to the Nixon administration. Torture and assassination has long been a policy of the United States, either directly by US nationals, or indirectly by outsourcing it to complicit or puppet regimes.