Showing posts with label oligopoly. Show all posts
Showing posts with label oligopoly. Show all posts

Friday, December 7, 2018

Russell A. Whitehouse — The Myth Of Capitalism – Book Review


A complement of Thomas Piketty's Capital in the 21st Century.

The principal point is that competition is the driver of capitalism as companies strive in the marketplace to achieve efficiency and effectiveness in anticipating and meeting demand. When competition decreases, the engine fails to function as an evolutionary force. This is hardly a new idea. See "What Is Monopoly Capital?" by  John Bellamy Foster and "Monopoly Capitalism" by Paul M. Sweezy. But the authors of The Myth of Capitalism document what is happening with it recently.

This also affects labor and the labor market:
...T&H write, “When workers have fewer employers to choose from in their line of work, their bargaining power disappears. Corporate giants can squeeze their suppliers, but the main thing companies buy is labor, and they have been squeezing workers.” Thus, wages have struggled to keep up with inflation for decades. Benefits are cut, while stock buybacks soar. Unhappy workers in all but 3 states can be shackled to soul-sucking jobs via non-compete clauses. Furthermore, “56% of private sector non-unionized workers are forced into mandatory arbitration and of those, 23% were also denied any access to class-action lawsuits. This means that nearly a quarter of working Americans in the private sector don’t have the basic right to sue their employer.”...
Eurasia Review
The Myth Of Capitalism – Book Review
Russell A. Whitehouse

Wednesday, December 5, 2018

Jonathan Tepper — Competition Is Dying, and Taking Capitalism With It

We need a revolution to cast off monopolies and restore entrepreneurial freedom. First of two excerpts from “The Myth of Capitalism.”
Bloomberg Opinion
Competition Is Dying, and Taking Capitalism With It
Jonathan Tepper

See also a short review of The Myth of Capitalism
A lot of times, when you read reviews about books on the economy, you end up wondering what the reviewer’s ‘priors’ are as people like to say in economics. You read the review and wonder where the biases of the reviewer are, because that can tell you a lot about the review.

So I’m going to lay it out there.
The ‘Corporatist’ is a kleptocrat masquerading as a believer in liberty. He uses terminology based in liberty to construct an ideology solely as a means of furthering the gains of a specific strata of society allied with the corporatist and at the expense of other strata, by coercion if necessary.
That’s me, seven years ago on this very website in a post I called Corporatism masquerading as Liberty. So, those are my priors coming into this; I’m someone who sees the ‘ideology’ of freedom and liberty being used as a cloak and shield for people who are almost entirely self-interested. And what I believe has happened is that ideology has been injected into our form of capitalism as a way of disarming naysayers and allowing the ‘Corporatist’ to benefit at everyone’s expense.
So when I read “The Myth of Capitalism" (henceforth The MOC) was subtitled “Monopolies and the Death of Competition", I was intrigued because the question for me was how self-interested people are able to reap all the gains of our system, while avoiding a lot of the downsides....
econintersect
"The Myth Of Capitalism"
Edward Harrison, Credit Writedowns

See also

"Freedom" at the tip of a missile. Making the world "safe" for capitalism American style, or else.

AntiWar
Pompeo Promises New Liberal World Order – New Wine In Old Bottles?
Ron Paul and Daniel McAdams

See also
Huawei chief financial officer Wanzhou Meng is facing extradition to the United States after being arrested in Canada on suspicion of violating U.S. sanctions on Iran, the Globe and Mail reports.
Making the world safe.

Axios
Zachary Basu

also
Mere hours after Chinese officials finally affirmed President Trump's description of Saturday's trade 'truce' - this after fears that the true nature of the agreement might have been "lost in translation" helped trigger the worst one-day market selloff since October - the DOJ has gone ahead and kicked the hornet's nest, seriously jeopardizing the prospects for a prolonged trade detente between the world's two biggest economies....
Zero Hedge
Trade Truce Over? Canada Arrests Huawei CFO At US Request
Tyler Durden

Monday, August 14, 2017

ProMarket — The Rise of Market Power and the Decline of Labor’s Share

The two standard explanations for why labor’s share of output has fallen by 10 percent over the past 30 years are globalization (American workers are losing out to their counterparts in places like China and India) and automation (American workers are losing out to robots). Last year, however, a highly-cited Stigler Center paper by Simcha Barkai offered another explanation: an increase in markups. The capital share of GDP, which includes what companies spend on equipment like robots, is also declining, he found. What has gone up, significantly, is the profit share, with profits rising more than sixfold: from 2.2 percent of GDP in 1984 to 15.7 percent in 2014. This, Barkai argued, is the result of higher markups, with the trend being more pronounced in industries that experienced large increases in concentration.

A new paper by Jan De Loecker (of KU Leuven and Princeton University) and Jan Eeckhout (of the Barcelona Graduate School of Economics UPF and University College London) echoes these results, arguing that the decline of both the labor and capital shares, as well as the decline in low-skilled wages and other economic trends, have been aided by a significant increase in markups and market power....
ProMarket — The blog of the Stigler Center at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business
The Rise of Market Power and the Decline of Labor’s Share
Asher Schechter

Wednesday, August 2, 2017

Noah Smith — Bust Up America's Monopolies Before They Do More Harm



Economists have been sounding the alarm about this trend for a while now. John Kwoka, an economist at Northeastern University, has literally written the book on the follies of the modern age of antitrust. In a new report, he shows how much more complacent the government has gotten toward oligopolies. The government still doesn’t tend to let a single company dominate any industry, but it’s usually fine with just five or six. Kwoka traces the change in attitudes to the rise of the so-called Chicago school approach to antitrust policy:
Bloomberg View
Bust Up America's Monopolies Before They Do More Harm
Noah Smith, contributor

Friday, May 19, 2017

Maciej CegÅ‚owski — Notes From An Emergency


Weekend reading. On tech feudalism as a key challenge of the digital era that is emerging. How to deal with it before it deals with us.

Idle Words
Notes From An Emergency
Maciej Cegłowski
ht Yves Smith at Naked Capitalism

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Mark Thoma — What's so bad about monopoly power?

What's so bad about a company amassing monopoly power? 
When firms have such power, they charge prices that are higher than can be justified based upon the costs of production, prices that are higher than they would be if the market was more competitive. With higher prices, consumers will demand less quantity, and hence the quantity produced and consumed will be lower than it would be under a more competitive market structure. 
The bottom line is that when companies have a monopoly, prices are too high and production is too low. There's an inefficient allocation of resources. 
In addition, the tactics used to establish monopoly power, such as driving competitors out of business or thwarting potential entrants, can also cause considerable harm to households who own the businesses that are forced to close their doors.… 
The problems with monopolies go beyond the economic effects. Many large, economically powerful companies also have considerable political influence and the ability to "capture" the political and regulatory process. This allows a powerful firm to tilt the legal and regulatory processes against any potential threat to its market power, and to bring about changes that further enhance the profits it earns.
CBS Money Watch
What's so bad about monopoly power?
Mark Thoma | Professor of Economics, University of Oregon

Thursday, June 19, 2014

Yves Smith — How Oligopolies Undermined Competitiveness and Produced Inequality


More on the neoclassical myth of the free market that provides the foundation for neoliberalism, neo-imperialism, and neocolonialism. Ordinary Americans were OK with neo-imperialism and neocolonialism when they were among the beneficiaries through trickle down. Not they are now noticing that they themselves are becoming marks. It always comes down to asymmetrical power, which the mob's crony-run propaganda machine in turn always suppresses.

Monday, April 14, 2014

Travis Gettys — Reddit co-founder tells Joe Rogan: Cable companies about to ‘f*ck up’ the Internet (via Raw Story )

Reddit co-founder tells Joe Rogan: Cable companies about to ‘f*ck up’ the Internet (via Raw Story )
The Internet faces an existential threat from the cable companies that provide service to millions of Americans, said the founder of Reddit.com. Web entrepreneur Alexis Ohanian appeared last week on the Joe Rogan Experience to talk about the future…

Thursday, December 13, 2012

Bonnie Kavoussi — Google, Apple Allegedly Conspired To Keep Wages Low: Lawsuit

Despite a heated rivalry, there's one thing Google and Apple allegedly worked together on: underpaying their workers.
Former employees of the companies filed a new complaint on Monday in an attempt to expand a lawsuit they filed last year into a class action case representing up to 100,000 technology workers. Much of the complaint was redacted for privacy reasons.
The lawsuit claims that Apple, Google, Intel, Intuit, Adobe, Lucasfilm and Pixar made "gentleman's agreements" to not recruit each other's employees between 2005 and 2009. By doing so, the lawsuit claims, these companies "artificially suppressed" wages in a rigid pay structure.
In addition, the suit alleges that former Apple CEO Steve Jobs, former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, and Intuit chairman Bill Campbell helped enforce recruiting bans. The lawsuit cites "CEO-to-CEO emails," do-not-call lists, and an analysis by UCLA economist Edward Leamer finding that the alleged poaching bans kept wages low.
The Huffington Post
Google, Apple Allegedly Conspired To Keep Wages Low: Lawsuit
Bonnie Kavoussi