Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Apple. Show all posts

Thursday, October 31, 2019

Sputnik — Huawei Sets Record Share of China’s Smartphone Market Beating Apple

Huawei’s smartphone shipments surged 66% year-on-year in the third quarter, according to research published Wednesday by research firm Canalys, capturing a record 42% of China’s overall smartphone market....
Sputnik International
Huawei Sets Record Share of China’s Smartphone Market Beating Apple

Sunday, September 8, 2019

Zero Hedge — China Accuses Apple, Foxconn Of Breaking Chinese Labor Laws

The biggest surprise, however, is that China appears to be right. When contacted by Bloomberg, Apple said that, after conducting an investigation, it found the “percentage of dispatch workers exceeded our standards” and that it is “working closely with Foxconn to resolve this issue.” It added that when it finds issues, it works with suppliers to “take immediate corrective action.” Foxconn Technology Group also confirmed the dispatch worker violation following an operational review.... 
Zero Hedge
China Accuses Apple, Foxconn Of Breaking Chinese Labor Laws
Tyler Durden

Tuesday, August 7, 2018

Tyler Durden — China Threatens Apple With "Anger And Nationalist Sentiment" If It Doesn't Share The Wealth


I was just wondering a day or two ago just how long it was going to take for China to play the Apple card.

Making an offer you can't refuse.

Coming to your neighborhood soon: Chinese boycott of US and US boycott of Chinese goods by patriotic consumers.

Zero Hedge
China Threatens Apple With "Anger And Nationalist Sentiment" If It Doesn't Share The Wealth
Tyler Durden

See also

Where did that technology come from?

The Political Economy of Development
Mariana Mazzucato on the State behind trillion dollar Apple
Nick Johnson

See also

What's the big deal?

The Los Angeles Times (13 July 2018)
The Chinese view: Ten truths about U.S.-China trade
Wang Yong | professor at the School of International Studies, Peking University and a non-resident Senior Fellow at the Center for China and Globalization, a private think-tank in Beijing

Thursday, January 18, 2018

Dean Baker — Apple Transfers $252 Billion in Citigroup Account from Irish Subsidiary to Parent Company


Dean Baker explains how international capital flow (capital flight and repatriation) is just a matter of switching account balances. There is no "cross-border" transfer of funds in "bringing back" dollars earned abroad.
This is what bringing money back to the United States means. Under the old tax law companies often attributed legal control of profits to foreign subsidiaries, so that they could defer paying taxes on this money. However the money was often actually held in the United States, since Apple could tell the subsidiary to keep the money wherever it wanted.
For this reason the economic significance of bringing the money back to the United States is almost zero. The legal change of ownership is leading to the collection of taxes, but this is in lieu of the considerably larger tax liability that Apple faced under the old law.
It would have been helpful if these points were made more clearly in this NYT piece. It does usefully point out that we don't know the extent to which the expansion plans announced by Apple would have occurred even without the tax cut.
Beat the Press
Apple Transfers $252 Billion in Citigroup Account from Irish Subsidiary to Parent Company
Dean Baker | Co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, D.C

Friday, October 13, 2017

Eli Meixler — Tim Cook Says Learning How to Code is More Important than English as a Second Language

Last month, the Apple exec told Fortune about how the company developed the programming language Swift to encourage students of all ages to learn to code.
“All this curriculum stuff is free. Anybody can have it that wants it around the world. We've done it in multiple languages,” he said.

Saturday, February 18, 2017

Ramanan — The All American iPhone: Bad, Or Good?


I would guess that an All-American iPhone would be even more of a luxury-aficianado product than it already is. Would that help or hurt Apple, and how would it affect the US economy. 

The iPhone is already a Veblen good in the Chinese market where it is losing market shares as Chinese companies produce increasing competitive lower-priced rivals. Apple's strategy is not to compete for the bottom end or even middle but to focus on the top. It's called "positioning" in marketing. American-made, like German-made, is also positioning.

The Case for Concerted Action
The All American iPhone: Bad, Or Good?
V. Ramanan

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Jeremy Scahill and Josh Begley —The Cia Campaign To Steal Apple’s Secrets

Researchers working with the Central Intelligence Agency have conducted a multi-year, sustained effort to break the security of Apple’s iPhones and iPads, according to top-secret documents obtained by The Intercept. 
The security researchers presented their latest tactics and achievements at a secret annual gathering, called the “Jamboree,” where attendees discussed strategies for exploiting security flaws in household and commercial electronics. The conferences have spanned nearly a decade, with the first CIA-sponsored meeting taking place a year before the first iPhone was released.
By targeting essential security keys used to encrypt data stored on Apple’s devices, the researchers have sought to thwart the company’s attempts to provide mobile security to hundreds of millions of Apple customers across the globe. Studying both “physical” and “non-invasive” techniques, U.S. government-sponsored research has been aimed at discovering ways to decrypt and ultimately penetrate Apple’s encrypted firmware. This could enable spies to plant malicious code on Apple devices and seek out potential vulnerabilities in other parts of the iPhone and iPad currently masked by encryption.
The CIA declined to comment for this story....
Gets worse.

Of course, anyone else doing this is conducting espionage and cyberwarfare.

The Intercept
Jeremy Scahill and Josh Begley

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Apple overreaching?


For nearly two years, Apple has wooed digital book publishers and authors with its unconditional support of the open EPUB standard. With last week’s introduction of iBooks 2.0, Apple has deliberately locked out that standard. Here’s why you should care.
Read it at ZDNet
How Apple is sabotaging an open standard for digital books
by Ed Bott
(h/t Edward Harrison | Credit Writedowns)
Antitrust regulators should be taking a long look at this pattern of anti-competitive behavior.
See also:
Apple's mind-bogglingly greedy and evil license agreement
by Ed Bott
For people like me, who write and sell books, access to multiple markets is essential. But that’s prohibited:
"Apple, in this EULA, is claiming a right not just to its software, but to its software’s output. It’s akin to Microsoft trying to restrict what people can do with Word documents, or Adobe declaring that if you use Photoshop to export a JPEG, you can’t freely sell it to Getty. As far as I know, in the consumer software industry, this practice is unprecedented."