Showing posts with label Chilcot Report. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chilcot Report. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

Robert Parry — Getting Fooled on Iraq, Libya, Now Russia

On the heels of the British Chilcot report exposing falsehoods to justify invading Iraq in 2003, a new U.K. inquiry found similar misconduct in the 2011 “regime change” in Libya, but no lessons are learned amid the West’s new propaganda about Russia, writes Robert Parry.
"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." Fool me over and over, I'm a moron. And I deserve what I get and don't get if I should know better.

Consortium News
Getting Fooled on Iraq, Libya, Now Russia
Robert Parry

Friday, July 15, 2016

Gilbert Doctorow — Brexit, the Chilcot Report and why we must prosecute our own war criminals

If we as a nation are to learn anything from the human tragedy we have sponsored in the Middle East over the past thirteen years, up to the ongoing civil war in Syria which our proxies among Gulf States enflame, then we must prosecute the war criminals In high office, whatever their party affiliation.
Why We Should Prosecute Our Own War Criminals.
Une parole franche
Brexit, the Chilcot Report and why we must prosecute our own war criminals
Gilbert Doctorow | European Coordinator of The American Committee for East West Accord Ltd.

Sunday, July 10, 2016

Calvin F. Exoo — The Chilcot Report Fails to Speak Plain Truth: Bush Lied, So Did Blair

The newly released Chilcot Report on Iraq is British understatement, to a fault. In fact, it is understated so far as to miss the plain truth of the matter. Saying only that extremely questionable intelligence "was not challenged [by the Bush and Blair regimes] and it should have been" is failing to say plainly what the evidence so clearly shows: George W. Bush lied; so did Tony Blair.…

Truthout
The Chilcot Report Fails to Speak Plain Truth: Bush Lied, So Did Blair
Juan Cole

Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Paul Robinson — Reflections on the war in Iraq and the Chilcot report

How shit happens, aka slouching toward war.
Chilcot suggests that the main reason Britain invaded Iraq in 2003 was that Prime Minister Tony Blair decided that the United Kingdom should stand ‘shoulder to shoulder’ with the United States come what may. Indeed, on 28 July 2002 Blair wrote a note to US President George Bush saying, ‘I will be with you, whatever.’
Blair preferred that the USA and UK not act unilaterally. Instead, he wanted them to gather international support for action against Iraq through the United Nations. Blair hoped that by standing resolutely alongside the Americans he might ‘influence’ them to go down the UN path. It also seems that he may have hoped that he could avoid war by persuading the UN to take a very firm stance against Iraq. The logic was that Saddam Hussein might back down if faced with the united opposition of the entire rest of the world. By threatening invasion, the UK could thereby prevent a war which was otherwise inevitable (given American preferences). The problem with this paradoxical logic was that a) Saddam didn’t actually have weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and so couldn’t ‘back down’, and b) Blair couldn’t persuade the rest of the world to support him in the UN. But once it became clear that this support was lacking, Blair had committed himself to supporting the Americans, and so had no option but to follow through with his threats, and to wage war.
Analysis: This story reveals the folly of the often repeated mantra that showing strength and resolution is the best way of preserving peace. Unfortunately, all too often such displays of resolution instead produce war. The story also provides further evidence of the folly of the idea that by standing alongside the Americans, you can somehow gain some useful ‘influence’ over them, and thereby promote your own country’s national interests, whereas if you fail to support America you will damage those interests.…
Pretty damning of all involved on the British side. The Americans come across as clueless and resolved to do what it takes, come what may. To the Hague with the lot of them.

Irrussianality
Reflections on the war in Iraq and the Chilcot report
Paul Robinson | Professor, Graduate School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Ottawa