Reminiscence of the Future
What Could Be Better Than...[Reading Michael Hudson]
Andrei Martyanov
See also from Andrei Martyanov today.
Who Would Have Thought.
An economics, investment, trading and policy blog with a focus on Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). We seek the truth, avoid the mainstream and are virulently anti-neoliberalism.
Introduction: I recently spoke to a relative of mine who, due to her constant and voluntary exposure to the legacy AngloZionist media, sincerely believed that the three Baltic states and Poland had undergone some kind of wonderful and quasi-miraculous economic and cultural renaissance thanks to their resolute break with the putatively horrible Soviet past and their total submission to the Empire since. Listening to her, I figured that this kind of delusion was probably common amongst those who still pay attention and even believe the official propaganda. So I asked Michael Hudson, whom I consider to be the best US economists and who studied the Baltics in great detail, to reply to a few very basic questions, which he very kindly did in spite of being very pressed on time. Once again, I want to sincerely thank him for his kind time, support and expertise. — The SakerThe Vineyard of the Saker
Hudson, who, by my primitive criteria, is one of the best (true) economics and economic history brains of our time doesn't mince the words and calls it as he sees it (correctly): Trump’s Trade Threats Are Really Cold War 2.0. Hudson correctly identifies the issue….Reminiscence of the Future
This interview was conducted at Peking University for the Second World Conference on Marxism, May 7, 2018. It was conducted by Lau Kin Chi of the Global University for Sustainability....Michael Hudson inherited impeccable Marxist credentials.
When I was 3 years old my father was put in jail under the Smith Act as a political prisoner for having the works of Lenin and Marx on his shelves and for being one of the leaders of the Minneapolis general strikes from 1934 to 1936. So I grew up knowing many members of the Russian Revolution, members of the Central Committee when Lenin was in power....
In 1960 when Leon Trotsky’s widow Natalia died, the executor of his estate Max Schachtman assigned me the copyrights, saying that since I was Trotsky’s godson, I should do a publishing company....Good read, even if you are not a fan. It's pretty funny to hear him tell the tales of what shaped him as an economist and historian of economics. Quite remarkable, actually.
SummaryGood post based on a Post Keynesian analysis. But doesn't mention either Hyman Minsky, whose financial instability hypothesis explains the financial cycle, or MMT, which would bolster his argument. However, I understand the scope of posts at blogs is limited, so he had to make choices, and overall the post is well done the way he sets it up.
- High private sector debt/GDP ratios will continue to hamper US economic growth.
- Mainstream macroeconomic models by design ignore the financial cycle and do not provide any insights about the financial cycle.
- Macroeconomic models should have macroeconomic foundations and incorporate financial stability considerations.
None of my beliefs are what Bloomberg and Caracas Chronicles implied.Moar on the creation of fake news by the MSM.
Abstract: Conflation of real capital with finance capital is at the heart of current misunderstandings of economic crisis and recession. We ground this distinction in the classical analysis of rent and the difference between productive and unproductive credit. We then apply it to current conditions, in which household credit — especially mortgage credit — is the premier form of unproductive credit. This is supported by an institutional analysis of postwar U.S. development and a review of quantitative empirical research across many countries. Finally, we discuss contemporary consequences of the financial sector’s malformation and overdevelopment.Michael Hudson
Too many liberals and progressives are stunningly ignorant of the war of ideas and ideologies hidden behind the staid mask of the academic discipline of economics. A common assumption is that the corporatist authoritarianism we must deal with today is a direct result of the structure of government established by the Constitution. Corporatism and exploitative financial capitalism were "baked into the cake," according to these people. A fairly typical statement: "The founders were focused almost exclusively on maintaining the status quo of property relations, which they already dominated."
I view the issue entirely differently: ever since the surrender of Cornwallis, the American republic has been under unceasing assault by its oligarchical enemies. The question to ask is: how was the American republic subverted and corrupted from within to erode its natural enmity to oligarchs and concentrations of power - economic as well as political?
Tom O’Brien conducted an excellent interview with Mathew Forstater in November 2012 on the topic of Marx and Modern Monetary Theory (MMT). The first half of the interview focuses on Marx, particularly in relation to primitive accumulation and fiat currency as one mechanism used to drive the process.…
The second half of the interview covers basic MMT while drawing out how operational relics left over from the gold standard era are contributing to the public misconception of government as a household.…