Showing posts with label Ron Paul. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ron Paul. Show all posts

Friday, February 23, 2018

Sputnik — 'We Can't Continue to Run the World': Ron Paul's EXCLUSIVE Interview for Sputnik

Former Texas Congressman and leading libertarian thinker Dr. Ron Paul has shared his views on President Trump's job as president after his first year in office, the situation in Syria and the renewed debate on gun control in the wake of the Florida school shooting....
Sputnik International
'We Can't Continue to Run the World': Ron Paul's EXCLUSIVE Interview for Sputnik

Tuesday, October 4, 2016

Sophia Tesfaye — Ron Paul Suggests Support for Jill Stein, Admits He Is 'Disappointed' by Gary Johnson


As you may have noticed, I'm staying away from politics here lately since everyone seems to have had enough it, but this is a shocker I couldn't resist.
“She’s probably the best on foreign policy at the moment,” Paul said of the Green Party nominee on Monday.

Saturday, April 25, 2015

Ellen Brown — The Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Death of the Republic


Ellen is a lawyer. She spells out the implications of what we know about the trade agreements that are being fast-tracked without public debate.


See also:

Truthdig
Noam Chomsky: Every Word in the Phrase ‘Free Trade Agreement’ Is False

Opponents need to attack TPP and TIPP based on national sovereignty. Any diminution of national sovereignty would create a flurry of outrage on the right and the GOP would be forced to back off with their base in an uproar.
Ron Paul says Free Trade Agreements erode National sovereignty, destroy jobs, and only serves the special interests. So-called "Free Trade" is Government-managed trade. 
When Noam Chomsky and Ron Paul agree, you can be sure that something is up.

Sunday, August 10, 2014

Dominique Mosbergen — Ron Paul Says U.S. 'Likely Hiding Truth' About MH17 Crash


Trouble on the anti-government right.
"Questions do remain regarding the serious international incident," Paul wrote last week of the MH17 crash. "Too bad we can’t count on our government to just tell us the truth and show us the evidence. I’m convinced that it knows a lot more than it’s telling us." 
This isn't the first time that Paul has accused the government of spreading "propaganda" following the MH17 crash. As The Hill points out, Paul -- in the days after the tragedy -- accused the Obama administration and the Western media of "join[ing] together to gain the maximum propaganda value from the disaster." He also suggested at the time that the U.S. might be partly to blame for the crash.
The Huffington Post
Ron Paul Says U.S. 'Likely Hiding Truth' About MH17 Crash
Dominique Mosbergen

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

David Edwards — Ron Paul urges Obamacare ‘nullification’ from former Confederate capital (via Raw Story )

Ron Paul urges Obamacare ‘nullification’ from former Confederate capital (via Raw Story )
Tea party hero Ron Paul (R-TX) told residents of the former capital of the Confederacy on Monday that “nullification” would eventually have to be used to “ignore the feds” because President Barack Obama’s health care reform law. At a campaign…

Thursday, September 19, 2013

David Edwards — Female anchor confronts Ron Paul over plan for women to quit work en masse and home school (via Raw Story )

Female anchor confronts Ron Paul over plan for women to quit work en masse and home school (via Raw Story )
BBC anchor Katy Kay on Thursday asked former Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) if his libertarian plan to have 20 percent of children home schooled made sense because so many women would have to drop out of the work force, but the former congressman insisted that…

Sunday, March 10, 2013

Colin Horgan — Will Rand and Ron Paul transform the GOP?

Republicans face two likely paths for their party’s future: Ron Paul’s libertarianism or a more moderate base
The Raw Story
Will Rand and Ron Paul transform the GOP?
Colin Horgan | The Guardian

Monday, December 24, 2012

Ron Paul on the security state


Ron Paul joins the voices being raised against the security state and the use of fear to justify suppression of rights in the name of "safety."
...School shootings, no matter how horrific, do not justify creating an Orwellian surveillance state in America.
Do we really believe government can provide total security? Do we want to involuntarily commit every disaffected, disturbed, or alienated person who fantasizes about violence? Or can we accept that liberty is more important than the illusion of state-provided security? Government cannot create a world without risks, nor would we really wish to live in such a fictional place. Only a totalitarian society would even claim absolute safety as a worthy ideal, because it would require total state control over its citizens’ lives. We shouldn’t settle for substituting one type of violence for another. Government role is to protect liberty, not to pursue unobtainable safety.
Rep. Ron Paul, 14th District of Texas
Government Security is Just Another Kind of Violence
Ron Paul
(h/t Zero Hedge)

Credit where credit it due.

However, there is a jump in logic in the argument:
Furthermore, do we really want to live in a world of police checkpoints, surveillance cameras, metal detectors, X-ray scanners, and warrantless physical searches?  We see this culture in our airports: witness the shabby spectacle of once proud, happy Americans shuffling through long lines while uniformed TSA agents bark orders.  This is the world of government provided "security," a world far too many Americans now seem to accept or even endorse.  School shootings, no matter how horrific, do not justify creating an Orwellian surveillance state in America.
Here's were the reasoning goes off the rails. The rationale for the security state and the surveillance state is combatting terrorism by waging a "global war on terror," not preventing school shootings or domestic crime, even the "war on drugs."

OK, Dr. Paul is objecting to the NRA plan to increase security here, but we already have a massive intrusion of government into civil liberties based on "terrorists." Then we learn that domestic security was monitoring Occupy protests closely to identify potential terrorists. This is the outrage that lovers of liberty need to be raising out voices in unison over.

Saturday, September 1, 2012

Brandon Smith — Guest Post: It Is Time For The Ron Paul Revolution To Move Beyond Politics


A stark realization dawns among the Ron Paul folks on the GOP. A rant worth reading for the portent it presents. The tenor of the comments is an indication.

Zero Hedge
Guest Post: It Is Time For The Ron Paul Revolution To Move Beyond Politics
Brandon Smith | Alt-Market

Friday, August 24, 2012

Barry Eichengreen — A Critique of Pure Gold


Interesting historical lesson, if a bit out of paradigm with MMT in some cases.

A Critique of Pure Gold
ReadPeriodicals
Publication: The National Interest
Author: Eichengreen, Barry
Date published: September 1, 2011
(h/t Mark Thoma)
Barry Eichengreen is the George C. Pardee and Helen N. Pardee Professor of Economics and Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley


Thursday, August 23, 2012

FT — Republicans eye return to gold standard

The gold standard has returned to mainstream US politics for the first time in 30 years, with a “gold commission” set to become part of official Republican party policy.
Drafts of the party platform, which it will adopt at a convention in Tampa Bay, Florida, next week, call for an audit of Federal Reserve monetary policy and a commission to look at restoring the link between the dollar and gold.
The move shows how five years of easy monetary policy – and the efforts of libertarian congressman Ron Paul – have made the once-fringe idea of returning to gold-as-money a legitimate part of Republican debate.
The Financial Times | U. S. Politics & Policy
Republicans eye return to gold standard
Robin Harding and Anna Fifield
(h/t Zero Hedge)

Really heading off into the bush.

Mark Thoma comments at Economist's View, 'Republicans Eye Return to Gold Standard,' quoting Krugman in 1996 extensively.

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Ron Paul — Our central bankers are intellectually bankrupt


Ron Paul get it essentially right regarding central banking, although I would disagree with him about his analysis of money, i.e., that "money is a commodity," that "capital cannot be created by government fiat," and the antidote is a "return to sound money."

Read it at The Financial Times

Our central bankers are intellectually bankrupt

by Ron Paul | U. S. House of Representatives
(h/t Ramanan in the comments)

Favorite line: "Control of the world’s economy has been placed in the hands of a banking cartel, which holds great danger for all of us."

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

"Lord Keynes" corrects Ron Paul

(1) At 1.07 onwards, Ron Paul tells us that he wants a “natural rate of interest.” I have news for Paul: there is no such thing; it is a fantasy, a myth.

(2) Paul tells us that inflation is theft. Well,why isn’t deflation theft, committed against debtors?

(3) Paul’s comments on the Roman empire are misleading. Paul implies that the Roman empire was destroyed by inflation, but that is false.
Read the whole thing at Social Democracy for the 21st Century (short)
Ron Paul versus Paul Krugman
by Lord Keynes

Friday, March 9, 2012

Ron Paul's does crazy on CNBC



Ron Paul was interviewed on CNBC this morning by Melissa Lee and Brian Sullivan. They gave him a total pass on his horribly flawed economic "logic."

Here are his main points and in italics I write what I would have said in response.

On the payroll gains Paul says, "I see these as blips,"

So, the jobs and income are not real to the people who have them?

"what about the person who wants to save and take care of their future? There’s no incentive there,"

For every saver there is a borrower. It's helping them.

"Why make the elderly suffer? They say that’s the price they have to pay.

Yet he is for eliminating Social Security and other social programs along with government spending almost completely. How does that help the elderly?

He would also let the market set interest rates instead of the Fed,

If the Fed/Treasury stepped out of the rate setting business, then US dollar interest rates would quickly go to zero (something he hates). The very fact that the US issues its own money necessitates reserve drains to keep rates above zero.

"When you keep interest rates at zero percent, isn't that a bit of quantitative easing?

QE is expansion of the Fed's balance sheet. Asset purchases. It's different than ZIRP.

The whole concept is wrong. There’s a lot of credit out there, but it’s being allocated by Congress. It completely distorts the market when you should be getting capital from savings and allocation of credit from the private sector.

The private sector would have no net dollar savings to lend unless the gov't runs a deficit. It therefore cannot lend, even if it wanted to. And who says it's better for it to be dictated solely by the private sector? That's his belief. It's not a fact.

"You have to get rid of the debt if you want economic growth again," he said.

They're getting rid of debt in Europe and growth is collapsing.



Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Ron Paul waves red flag about US fascism


“We’ve slipped away from a true Republic,” Paul said. “Now we’re slipping into a fascist system where it’s a combination of government and big business and authoritarian rule and the suppression of the individual rights of each and every American citizen.” 
He repeatedly denounced President Barack Obama’s recent enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012. Provisions within the $662 billion defense spending bill contained a controversial section that required terrorism suspects to be detained by the military without trial, regardless of where they were captured. 
While signing the bill on December 31, Obama issued a statement in which he pledged that the new laws would not violate Americans’ constitutional rights. But human rights advocates said Obama’s signing statement did not prevent future administrations from abusing the law.
Read it at Raw Story
by Eric W. Dolan

This is one thing that Libertarians and Occupy agree on.

Unfortunately, some progressives are also buying into Paul's Rothbardian Austrian economics, too, failing to understand that the natural outcome of  survival of the (economically) fittest is the exaltation of the grand acquisitors. Since this system favors creditors, it results in neo-feudalism and is the road to serfdom in the form of permanent low wages and debt-peonage.

UPDATE: See also Tomgram: Andrew Bacevich, Uncle Sam, Global Gangster
includes Scoring the Global War on Terror — From Liberation to Assassination in Three Quick Rounds
by Andrew J. Bacevich

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Culture Wars And Craziness


The Occupy movement's evolving agenda is in danger of being sullied by association with neo-Nazi David Duke and antigovernment crusader Ron Paul.
Read it at AlterNet
How Right-Wing Libertarians, John Birchers and Conspiracy Freaks Are Trying to Hijack the Occupy Movement
by Eric Johnson

In my anecdotal experience this is not affecting only Occupy and the 99% movement. Quite a few people with whom I am acquainted, who I had thought were sane, are falling into this hole of dark fantasizing about conspiracy theory. For some it is an anxiety neurosis, but for others, often the leaders, it is a paranoid psychosis. But for many, it is only uncritical thinking that can be countered by introducing rigor.

A lot of this centers around the Fed and it related in some way to Ron Paul and Rockwell-Rothbard Libertarianism, based on the persistent conspiracy theory about and "international banking cabal" instituting a "new world order" based on a repressive "world government" under UN aegis — the Money Masters, Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign Relations stuff that is supposedly controlled by "the Rothschilds." There is just enough fact to support the outlandish claims, so that uncritical minds make logical jumps that are unwarranted.

This quote from the article cited above sums it up.
For many of the people involved in the Occupy movement, this is their first involvement with political activism. Their openness to new ideas and reluctance to embrace any one political dogma is refreshing. But as the saying goes: “It’s good to have an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out.”