Tuesday, June 14, 2016

Hillary Clinton's election fraud finally exposed. California stolen from Bernie Sanders!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoGeDGHmwJU


Published on 9 Jun 2016

I've been researching around the clock trying to dig up as much evidence as I could of the election fraud in California. When I first saw the results of California I knew immediately some fuckery was afoot. The results were way out of the margin of error and the cancelled exit polls were a red flag. I have discovered that Bernie Sanders won California by a land slide but most of his votes were not counted. I've compiled most of my evidence in this video in a dramatic documentary format. Please spread this video around and burn this evil witch with the sunlight she fears. 

Proof that voting machines can be flipped https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvF21...

Voting manipulation evidence. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IAJ5...

This video is based on and worded around this article: http://justicegazette.org/bernie-defr...

Full video of poll worker Ashley Beck https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PW0bf...

15 comments:

Ryan Harris said...

People tend to chicken out when they get to the voting booth and are faced with big changes from the status quo. Despite all of the pooh poohing Hillary, she is a formidable candidate, the first woman, backed whole heatedly by the two party elite.
Winners write history and losers make conspiracy theory. Bernie may have lost unfair and unsquare, but that is how a two party republican system is supposed to work --shut down the populist riff raff with safer alternatives. Even if there is a grain of truth to these claims of cheating, the MSM can't report on conspiracy. They could lose their broadcast licence, Democrat political appointees run the agency and their ivy league colleagues head up nearly every regulatory agency and most courts and most of the justice department posts.
Not to worry though, questionably elections are fairly common in our history and yet the country is strong with security forces that can never be defeated. Bush Gore, Kennedy, Adams, Hayes. Both parties cheat when necessary, but it's not too consequential because two party candidates are very similar to one another. What is important is that everyone recognise the inevitability and rally around their party to ensure the glorious two party union rules for another two hundred years. Not this one silly election.

Kaivey said...

Hilary and Trump don't seem all that safe to me.

wilwon32 said...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvF21

Search
An error occurred during validation.

This video does not exist.

Sorry about that.

wilwon32 said...

I was unable to obtain the indicated info from any of the 3 links.

Ryan Harris said...

To me either! in the true sense in terms of economy, environment, and justice they seem poorly suited to lead.
Also in the "safer for the republic government" sense, where policies benefit the elite, Trump is certainly not ideal to that end.

Roger Erickson said...

Here are some links I found, when none of the ones above worked.

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/election-fraud-rico-lawsuit-alleging-widespread-e-vote-rigging-dnc-primaries-derail-clinton-nomination/

http://justicegazette.org/bernie-defrauded-in-ca.html

Roger Erickson said...

just google "california voter fraud"

the news keeps changing; sensationalized on both sides

Bob said...

I wouldn't be surprised if those videos got taken down.

Unknown said...

Justice gazette Article
Voting Manipulation Evidence Part I
Voting Manipulation Evidence Part II
Vote Machine Flipping
What happened in California
Nicole Sandler Show Interview with Bob Fitrakis

Kaivey said...

Rigged Voting Machines...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx5YyiyWOH4

Malmo's Ghost said...

I'm outside of Chicago and we have paper ballots and use marker on them. They are then inserted into a machine for counting. I don't think these are easily rigged. Diebold needs to be banned from all elections.

Unknown said...

Malmo's Ghost - there were issues raised about the Chicago election also. Paper trails are no good if the audit is forced to conform to the reported result - see How Bernie Sanders is losing primaries to Hillary Clinton Chicago Board of elections This is an extract from the Chicago BoE meeting

Malmo's Ghost said...

I'm not in Crook County. I'm in DuPage. Huge difference.

Salsabob said...

Who falls for this moronic crude.

First, the CA party rules, in place for at least a year, was that a "no party preference" (NPP) voter needed to request a Dem or Rep ballot or would just be given the NPP valid - that rule goes to the heart of laws to keep poll workers from influencing voters going into the booth - any person who doesn't understand that is a complete moron. The California media market had been drenched by this issue and what a NPP voter needed to do at the polls for the last 6 months. One indication of that is the 10s of thousands of voters who changed their rather recent registration with the American Independent Party because the media drench made it clear that they had not signed up as independent voters (that would be a NPP registration) but had actually registered with the Party of George Wallace! The bubble-headed bleach blond Valley Girl that puts forth the main argument of this video is a clear example that you can't fixed stupid - and apparently the tons of stupid that apparently resides in California's Sanders supporters.

The video's second assertion is that some number of voters who thought they had registered as Dems instead were listed as Reps when they went to the polls. The evidence the video presents is a single photo of a ballot that somebody had blacked out. That's it. Does the maker of the video really believe you are that gullible? Apparently. Are you?

And then the grand finality of the third argument - voting machines! Why? Well, voting machines! Because, well, Chicago!

Here's what really happened. CA allows mail-in voting a month or more prior to an election and historically half of the state's voters take advantage of that but all analysis indicated record-breaking levels of mail-ins would happened in this primary. Clinton's campaign went after those voters very aggressively, those voters tend to be older, Dem party members that actually vote with high frequency, but the Clinton team made sure of that with micro-targeting door-to-door contact; Sanders' team was comparatively flat-footed. If you watched on election night, you saw an incredible launch out of the gate by Clinton's vote count over Sanders' - that was the mail-in vote. Sanders could not dig out of that hole. It's funny how the video mentions a couple of counties where the ELECTRONIC vote, at the poll on election day, showed Sanders out front - did they mention anything about those counties' mail in vote? Too funny.

Please don' be the moron that this video requires you to be. If you can't help yourself, please stay away from the ballot box, and please, please, if you are being considered for jury duty, let the judge know that you are a complete moron - being truthful about this could actually save an innocent person's life or keep a psychopath off the streets.

wilwon32 said...

Lee Camp's You Tube videos are a good source for interesting interviews; I thought that his guest - Roque DeLa Fuentes might represent a a presidential candidate who, while no mention is offered to suggest MMT influences, has/had platform compatible with MMT objectives:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1K_6dbLHESg&feature=em-share_video_user

Rocky also hosts an interesting site:

http://www.democracyfails.com/
also:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTIC4exgsnk