Paul Krugman is tinkering with a model which explains monopoly rents on products with ‘zero’ or at least very low production costs (pharmaceutical products, computer programs like Excel). But he does not yet mention that (A) electronic fiat money is the ultimate zero production costs product while (B) the seigniorage interest profits made by the banks which produce it are to quite some extent based upon ‘land’related loans. Think of a loan for house purchase, financed by freshly produced money and a 4% interest rate. This income often is, to the extent that it’s used to buy already existing land with a high location value or leads to an inflationary increase of house prices, an often overlooked rent income.
Friday, June 21, 2013
Merijn Knibbe on land rent and financial rent.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
But he does not yet mention that (A) electronic fiat money is the ultimate zero production costs product while (B) the seigniorage interest profits made by the banks which produce it are to quite some extent based upon ‘land’related loans. Merijn Knibbe
Let Krugman attack the banking cartel and I'll take him a lot more seriously. Surely he is well enough established to speak the truth? If not now, then when?
Post a Comment