Tuesday, March 27, 2018

Xinhua — Truth behind China-U.S. trade 'imbalances'

Deconstructing the aggregates.
The gap resulted mainly from differences in statistical approaches, such as whether or not to include transit trade in the calculations, according to Zhang Monan, researcher with China Center for International Economic Exchanges.
Such discrepancies have inflated the U.S. calculation of its trade deficit with China by about 20 percent every year, according to Minister of Commerce Zhong Shan.
The United States is home to many multinational companies that have a global supply chain, but the current total value statistical method has distorted reality, analysts said.
An iPhone, for example, uses components made in different countries around the world and is only assembled and manufactured in China, but the calculation of trade statistics attributed most of the value to China.
"In this case, China is taking the blame for others," Zhang said.
She added that most of the profits actually went to U.S. companies but the value of the products was reflected in Chinese exports, resulting in inaccurate statistics.
What's more, when talking about the deficit with China, the United States always played down trade of services, according to Tu Xinquan, professor at the University of International Business and Economics.
Data from China's Ministry of Commerce showed that the country has a service trade deficit with the United States, and the gap has been widening.
Official data showed China's service trade deficit totaled 255.4 billion U.S. dollars last year, with the United States as a major contributor. From 2006 to 2016, China's service trade deficit with the United States increased by more than 30 times..
Statistical differences aside, the fact that the United States is not only running a trade deficit with China, but many other countries means the root cause of the imbalance is the U.S. economic structure, which features low savings and high consumption.
In the past decades, U.S. businesses transferred their manufacturing bases to countries with cheap labor and low costs, which helped drive up their profits and benefited consumers.
In a world whose prosperity has been built on the free flow of trade and investment, price-sensitive consumers largely decided the directions of trade, either for exports or imports.
"China has been a major market where the United States enjoyed its fastest export growth, and an important cause of the trade imbalance is the fact that many U.S. goods are less competitive in the Chinese market," said Long Guoqiang, deputy director of the Development Research Center of the State Council.
Solutions to the U.S.-China trade deficit do not come from cutting imports from China, but from U.S. enterprises making their products more competitive, he said.
Joe Kaeser, CEO of Siemens AG, held the same view.
"I believe people should not confuse the lack of competitiveness with unfair trade. If companies lack competitiveness, they need to invest in innovation and people development in order to catch up," he told reporters at the China Development Forum in Beijing.
As China has repeatedly stressed, the trade imbalance between the two countries is mainly a result of different economic structures, industrial competitiveness, and international division of labor, and China has never sought a trade surplus as the flow of trade is determined by the market.
Another factor that has often been overlooked is that U.S. control of high-tech exports to China contributed a lot to trade deficit with China, Minister Zhong said earlier this month, quoting one U.S. research report which estimated a 35-percent fall in trade deficit with China if the United States relaxed export restrictions.... 

See also

The West gangs up on China, even though Germany runs a chronic trade surplus, as have US allies Japan and South Korea.

Trump talks China trade with Merkel, Macron
Megan Cassella

The Trump administration is considering a crackdown on Chinese investments in technologies the U.S. considers sensitive by invoking a law reserved for national emergencies, among other options, according to people familiar with the matter.

Treasury Department officials are working on plans to identify technology sectors in which Chinese companies would be banned from investing, such as semiconductors and so-called 5G wireless communications, according to four people with knowledge of the proposal, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
What will happen when China declares rare earths a strategic resource and prohibits export?

U.S. Weighs Use of Emergency Law to Curb Chinese Takeovers 
Andrew Mayeda, Saleha Mohsin, and David McLaughlin

But, deal must clear Treasury committee, which killed Broadcom's bid for Qualcomm.
Ars Technica
Foxconn snaps up Belkin—including Linksys, Wemo brands—for $866 million
Cyrus Farivar


Ryan Harris said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
djrichard said...

This is easy. Just measure China's repatriation of US currency into other things besides goods and services from the US. E.g. what is China's direct foreign investment in the US (private bonds, public bonds and stocks)? That should pretty much capture the bulk of the trade imbalance. But if they want to be complete add other categories too: their acquisition of real-estate in the US, corporations in the US, etc.