Showing posts with label Jan Kregel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jan Kregel. Show all posts

Sunday, November 19, 2017

Steve Roth — “In the Beginning…Was the Unit of Account” – Twelve Myths About Money

Jan Kregel presented a great dinner speech at the recent Modern Monetary Theory Conference, touching on some of the fundamental ways we think about money and economics. (Sorry, no recording or transcript available.) I had a brief conversation with him afterwards, and we followed up with a few emails.
The quotation in the title of this post is condensed from the final line of one of his emails — a line that made me laugh out loud:
“So I guess we start from that — in the beginning was the word, and the word was the unit of account?”
Okay, yes: money-dweeb humor. But the implications are kind of profound.
The Word. Logos. Indeed. I’ve written about this before — how writing in its earliest forms emerged from tally sheets, accounting. Even, that its emergence was the first step on the road to outsourcing our memory onto iPhones, maybe even (only somewhat tongue in cheek) causing human brains to shrink over millennia.
Jan’s great line, and our conversations, prompt me to set down some thoughts on this ever-vexed subject. Herewith, twelve widespread usages and conceptions that, in my experience, tie our money discussions in knots. Please assume that anything you don’t like here is mine, not Jan’s, and apologies to those who have heard some of this from me before....
Asymptosis
“In the Beginning…Was the Unit of Account” – Twelve Myths About Money
Steve Roth

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Lars P. Syll — Hicks’ misrepresentation of Keynes — the Wicksellian connection

Having read my post on Krugman and Hicks’ IS-LM misrepresentation of Keynes’ theory, professor Jan Kregel kindly sent an unpublished article he wrote back in 1984 — The Importance of Choosing a Model: Hicks vs. Keynes on Money, Interest and Prices — in which it is argued that Hicks’ particular presentation of Keynes’ theory and choice of model was “crucial to its destruction”…
Lars P. Syll’s Blog
Hicks’ misrepresentation of Keynes — the Wicksellian connection
Lars P. Syll | Professor, Malmo University

Saturday, February 28, 2015

Jan Kregel — Europe At The Crossroads – Financial Fragility And The Survival Of The Single Currency

To outside observers, Germany's insistence that the new Greek government continue to impose austerity policies in the presence of rising unemployment and mounting debt levels appears to defy economic logic. However, an acquaintance with the historical evolution of the path to the creation of the common currency in the European Union (EU) sheds some light on the logic of the German government's strategy in dealing with the eurozone sovereign debt crisis and its negative response to Greece's request for an alternative economic policy.

Given the continuing divergence between progress in the monetary field and political integration in the euro area, the German interest in imposing austerity may be seen as representing an attempt to achieve, de facto, accelerated progress toward political union; progress that has long been regarded by Germany as a precondition for the success of monetary unification in the form of the common currency.
 
Yet no matter how necessary these austerity policies may appear in the context of the slow and incomplete political integration in Europe, these policies are ultimately unsustainable.

The survival and stability of the euro, in the absence of further progress in political unification, paradoxically require either sustained economic stagnation or the maintenance of what Hyman Minsky would have recognized as a Ponzi scheme. Neither of these alternatives is economically or politically sustainable.
Levy Economics Institute of Bard College
Europe At The Crossroads – Financial Fragility And The Survival Of The Single Currency
Jan Kregel | Senior Scholar

Note: Paragraphing changed for ease of reading online.

Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Michael Stephens—New Book: Economic Development and Financial Instability, Selected Essays of Jan Kregel

The first collection of essays by Jan Kregel, focusing on the role of finance in development and growth, has just been made available through Anthem (edited by Rainer Kattel).
Multiplier Effect
New Book: Economic Development and Financial Instability, Selected Essays
Michael Stephens

Friday, April 18, 2014

Michael Stephens — Minsky and Financial Reform’s “Never Ending” Struggle

In a new policy brief, Jan Kregel looks at a lesser-known, early period of Minsky’s work on financial reform. In the ’60s, Minsky was a consultant to a number of government agencies, including the Federal Reserve, on issues related to financial regulation. In this context, he came up with a new approach to bank examination, which he called “cash-flow based.” The new approach evaluated bank liquidity, not as an innate feature of a particular class of assets, but as a function of the balance sheet of the institutions under examination, the markets for those assets, the state of the macroeconomy and the financial system as a whole, and much else. In fact, as Kregel explains, what Minsky was after here was related to an early form of what we now call “macroprudential regulation.”
Multiplier Effect
Minsky and Financial Reform’s “Never Ending” Struggle
Michael Stephens

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Randy Wray and Jan Kregel — Financial Governance for Innovation and Social Inclusion (Video)


Videos.
The Levy Institute’s Jan Kregel and L. Randall Wray took part in a workshop at the UK House of Commons, November 25th, on “Financial Governance for Innovation and Social Inclusion,” organized by Mariana Mazzucato (SPRU) and Leonardo Burlamaqui (Ford Foundation) and hosted by Shadow Minister for the Cabinet Office, MP Chi Onwurah. Kregel and Wray’s presentations follow:
Multiplier Effect
Financial Governance for Innovation and Social Inclusion (Video)
Posted by Michael Stephens

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Michael Stephens — Kregel and Galbraith on the Euro Crisis

Earlier this month the Athens Development and Governance Institute and the Levy Economics Institute held a forum on the eurozone crisis: “Exiting the Crisis: The Challenge of an Alternative Policy Roadmap.” Below are the remarks [on video] delivered by senior scholars Jan Kregel and James Galbraith.
Multiplier Effect
Kregel and Galbraith on the Euro Crisis
Michael Stephens

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Michael Stephens — Announcing the Levy Institute Master of Science in Economic Theory and Policy

Starting in fall 2013, the Levy Economics Institute will begin offering theMaster of Science in Economic Theory and Policy, a two-year degree program designed to meet the preprofessional needs of undergraduates in economics and finance. Headed by Senior Scholar and Program Director Jan Kregel, this innovative program draws on the expertise of Institute scholars and select Bard College faculty, and emphasizes empirical and policy analysis through specialization in one of four key research areas: macroeconomic theory, policy, and modeling; monetary policy and financial structure; distribution of income, wealth, and well-being, including gender equality and time poverty; and employment and labor markets.
Multiplier Effect
Announcing the Levy Institute Master of Science in Economic Theory and Policy
Michael Stephens

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Michael Stephens — The Missing Wall Street Debate

This issue of complexity isn’t just a challenge for the press. It’s also a public policy problem. Jan Kregel argues that the more recent JPMorgan and LIBOR scandals demonstrate that the financial conglomerates involved are “too big to manage” and too big to regulate effectively. This isn’t a fact of nature. This is the financial system we have built. Whether we’re able to make informed public choices about the future of financial regulation is also bound up with the question of whether we will have a financial system whose operations can be readily supervised and understood.
Multiplier Effect
The Missing Wall Street Debate
Michael Stephens

Monday, August 6, 2012

Michael Stephens — Which LIBOR Scandal?

In his recent commentary on the LIBOR scandal, Jan Kregel elaborates on a distinction that is crucial to understanding this story. The scandal centers around revelations that financial institutions had been manipulating their LIBOR rate submissions to the British Bankers’ Association (BBA). Questions have subsequently been raised as to whether regulators were aware of and condoned, or actively encouraged, these manipulations. But as Kregel explains, there were two very different types of manipulation that were going on, and the distinction between the two is acutely relevant to evaluating attempts to pin a major share of the blame for this scandal on regulators and central bank officials.
Read it at Multiplier Effect
Which LIBOR Scandal?
Michael Stephens