Showing posts with label Black Sea. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Black Sea. Show all posts

Sunday, November 25, 2018

Kerch Kerfuffle


WWI and WWII began in Eastern Europe.

Coincidentally, a similar situation exists in the South China Sea as in the Black Sea and Sea of Azov.

Any coordination with the CW attack on Aleppo?

Geopolitical Alert
Tensions Flair in Black Sea & Donbass Days After UK’s New Deployments to Region
Jim Carey

Fort Russ News
BREAKING: Ukraine Begins Heavy Shelling of Donetsk Republic
Joaquin Flores

TASS
Russia asks for convening UN SC meeting on Sea of Azov situation

TASS
Ukraine’s Security Council proposes to impose martial law in the country for 60 days

Ecns
Moscow confirms Russia shoots, holds 3 Ukrainian naval ships in Black Sea
Xinhua

The Vineyard of the Saker
Kerch Provocation – Causes and Consequences
Rostislav Ishchenko
Translated by Ollie Richardson and Angelina Siard

RT
Tense standoff around Kerch Strait between Russia & Ukraine: How it developed

TASS
Ukraine’s army put on full combat alert - Defense Ministry

Anti-Media
Ukraine Set to Declare War on Russia
Jason Ditz




Friday, April 15, 2016

BBC — Kerry: Shooting down Russia jets 'would have been justified'


This would be hilarious if it weren't so serious. The US sends its Aegis equipped Navy to intimidate Russia and Russia responds by intimidating the US ship. This kind of deliberate provocation is behavior characteristic of juveniles and crime organizations. And the US started it by "prepositioning" resources related to a first strike capability. Then spins it as through Russia were acting aggressively or that China is "militarizing" the South China Sea. Both Russia and China are sending strong signals that they will not be intimidated militarily and will meet provocation with provocation, as well as responding "asymmetrically."

Not mentioned in the article:
Do you remember the spring 2014 incident involving the USS Donald Cook and the SU-24 in the Black Sea? There were reports that the SU-24 used some kind of electronic magic to shut down all systems on the Aegis destroyer. The destroyer then quickly steamed to a friendly port. At the time, I couldn’t decide if there was any truth to this story or it was just false war propaganda. Seems there was a lot of truth to that story. Is this the system that shut down the USS Donald Cook? And now it’s in Syria along with the Krasukha-4 jamming station and who knows what other pieces of radio electronic combat wizardry. My advice for anyone eager to teach the Russians a lesson is to proceed very cautiously, or better yet, just STFU and reexamine your own military forces.
Seems that the Russians were listening as our defense experts were touting full spectrum dominance as the cornerstone of our military doctrine. Our doctrine was/is based on seeing and knowing it all. In response, the Russians moved to dominate the full spectrum in classic Soviet/Russian radio electronic combat style. This approach balanced the preservation of their forces (force protection) while enhancing their ability to apply offensive combat power. With apologies to Heinlein, technology is a harsh mistress… especially when it lays with a sober doctrinal philosophy.
Sic Semper Tyrannis
"Russian Jamming System Blocks All NATO Electronics Inside Bubble 600 Km in Diameter over Syria" - TTG

See also
After a decade and a half of counterinsurgency operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and beyond—longer than even in Vietnam—decades of assumptions about warfare are once again being re-evaluated. McMaster and other top generals have concluded that while the United States was bogged down in the Middle East, Moscow focused its energies on rebuilding its own forces to potentially counter America’s tactics.
See, it's Putler again.
Politico
The Secret U.S. Army Study That Targets Moscow
Bryan Bender

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

Marshall Auerback — Russia’s Perpetual Battle For A Warm Water Port

Because of Russia’s geographical disadvantage and its necessity for access to warm waters, the Black Sea matters much more to Moscow than the Caribbean Sea to Washington or the South China Sea to Beijing. The United States had the Monroe Doctrine to protect its hemispheric waters, while today China defines its sea as “blue national soil.” Russia has never articulated its Black Sea doctrine, but make no mistake: it has one. Any attempt — real or perceived — to challenge Russia’s maritime interests in the Black Sea will face a stark response. 
This absence of a stated Russian doctrine may explain the West’s interpretation of the takeover of Crimea as the beginning of an attempt to restore a bygone empire. But as European and American leaders contemplate what to do next with Russia, it is worth remembering that Putin’s takeover of Crimea has much more in common with Tsar Nicholas’s concerns in the Black Sea in 1914 than Leonid Brezhnev’s in Czechoslovakia in 1968. Putin’s takeover was an act in defense of Russia’s national interest, fully consistent with the country’s geopolitical DNA, rather than one of sheer, blind aggression.
Macrobits by Marshall Auerback
Russia’s Perpetual Battle For A Warm Water Port
Marshall Auerback