In this video Hilary Clinton admits that the US government created and funded Al-Qaeda in order to fight the soviet union, and she even considers that as a good thing. But she claims that the Americans are fighting Al-Qaeda nowadays. If you really fighting Al-Qaeda, then who are the scums and terrorists you used in order to topple the government of Qaddafi in Libya.
Friday, August 24, 2018
Hillary Clinton : We created Al-Qaeda
In this video Hilary Clinton admits that the US government created and funded Al-Qaeda in order to fight the soviet union, and she even considers that as a good thing. But she claims that the Americans are fighting Al-Qaeda nowadays. If you really fighting Al-Qaeda, then who are the scums and terrorists you used in order to topple the government of Qaddafi in Libya.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
13 comments:
Instead of concentrating on the real Benghazi scandal (the embassy was running a jihadi operation to overthrow Gaddafi), Americans have been bombarded with Killary being slow and disorganised and failing to protect the embassy. Failing to protect the embassy from jihadis who were being run from the embassy! Very funny.
1. Kaivey: Good post.
2. John: Good comment. Also, the white protestant Republican base wants nothing to do with thinking about the embassy running a jihadi operation to overthrow Gaddafi or (per Seymour Hersh) Assad. The Democrat base wants nothing to do with thinking about Obama and Hillary being war criminals. Apparently no amount of facts or evidence can shake those people back to reality.
In addition to al-Qaeda, the West also created ISIS,™ plus al-Nusra, and all the other mercenary terrorist groups in the Middle East. All jihadist movements are engineered by the West, plus Israel and Saudi Arabia.
In the late 1950s the West created the Muslim Brotherhood as a foil against secular Arab governments.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Unrelated…
Sen. John McCain has discontinued his treatment for cancer. This means the end is very near.
I can hear the Munchkins singing.
Ding, dong, the a**hole’s dead…
@ Kaivey:
This is off topic, but just as many Americans have Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS), many Britons have Corbyn Derangement Syndrome (CDS).
The leading purveyor of CDS is The Guardian, which continually chants the “Corbyn-anti-Semite” mantra.
“Corbyn-anti-Semite”
“Corbyn-anti-Semite”
“Corbyn-anti-Semite”
Many of The Guardian’s columns are written by supremacist Jews. One of those Jews says she is programming her three-year old daughter about the mythical “holocaust”™ in case Corbyn becomes Prime Minister.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/23/jewish-young-antisemitism-children-anne-frank
However Jewish supremacism is only one part of the issue. And to be sure, not all U.K. Jews are allied with the Blairite neoliberals. Some Jews support Corbyn.
As I see it, Corbyn Derangement Syndrome is a product of the battle between [1] members of the Blairite neoliberal gang in the “Labour” party, and [2] anti-neoliberals in the Labour Party, who are led by Corbyn.
The Blairite neoliberal gang is allied with the Tories, who are also neoliberals. All are puppets of bankers, financiers, and military contractors. Secretly they are not fans of Jews and Israel, but publicly they worship Jews and Israel, in order to push the “Corbyn-anti-Semite” smear.
Corbyn Derangement Syndrome has been raging since Corbyn became Labour leader three years ago. Each year the media chant gets louder.
“Corbyn-anti-Semite”
“Corbyn-anti-Semite”
“Corbyn-anti-Semite”
Now the Blairite neoliberals are preparing to adopt a new official definition of “anti-Semitism” written by supremacist Jews (i.e. written by the International holocaust™ Remembrance Alliance) that will outlaw any questioning of Israeli atrocities. This is a trap that Blairite neoliberals in the Labour Party are laying for Corbyn and his progressive allies. Blairite neoliberals don’t want Corbyn to become Prime Minister.
Blairites in the Labour Party are just like leading Democrats in the USA. Both groups are neoliberal, meaning they work only for the rich. Both use the corporate media outlets as a weapon against progressive voices. Both despise the masses, and distract them with garbage (i.e. TDS and CDS). Both divide the masses by pushing identity politics, rather than economic class politics.
However there is one difference…
Corbyn is losing because he is weak. He placates his enemies (the Tories and by Blairite neoliberals) rather than denouncing the “Corbyn-anti-Semite” smear.
Meanwhile among average people, Corbyn’s defenders are not as energized as are Trump’s defenders.
By contrast, Trump will be re-elected in 2020, and neoliberal Democrats will make no gains in November 2018. Reason: Trump supports will vote, but most Democrats will stay home, since they despise their own neoliberals (e.g. Hillary, Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, etc).
Incidentally the corporate media outlets created Trump. Seeking to install Hillary in the White House, they gave endless free publicity to Trump, thinking that average Americans would see him as a clown. However the plot went awry, and the corporate media outlets have been furious ever since. It is they who push the Russia-gate hoax and Trump Derangement Syndrome. They plus leading Democrats, plus residual bureaucrats from the Hillary-Obama gang.
Bob, when it comes to economics I can't say I agree with anything libertarians say. But on all other matters, the only organised group of people who talk sense and are courageous enough to tell the truth, no matter how much it hurts them, are the libertarians. I would add the Greens, but they're more disorganised than organised. One of the great political tragedies of the past decade is the left not taking Ron Paul's compromise offer of voting for him on the basis that he wouldn't do anything economically radical (he'd leave social security, Medicare and Medicaid untouched) but would go after the Pentagon budget, which has effectively turned a democratic republic into a national security state that bangs up millions of people and allows zombie banks to control the political process. Ron Paul knows what the real dangers to the country are, and they're not poor people on food stamps, although as a point of principle he'd like to get rid of all these programs. But as a point of political compromise, he was willing to ignore his purist instincts and instead save the country from death merchants and the finance sector.
The libertarians and the left have to figure out a compromise that they can come together on. Other than the survival of the country, not much hangs in the balance. If I lived in the US I'd vote libertarian every time, but only because I'd choose to live in Arizona.
Talking about Arizona - and very related to the continued existence of the species, Konrad! - thankfully that stinking piece of shit John McCain is close to the end. Then it's hell for that evil bastard, if such a thing exists. If only the Vietnamese knew that they had before them one of the most dangerous warmongers the world has ever known, they could have saved the world so much bloodshed when they had the chance. Opportunity only knocks once. At least we can celebrate his agony. Does it hurt, Johnny? Are you scared? Are you crying like the piece of shit you are?
McCain is now a vegetable rotting in Cornville, a small town in Arizona.
Being a war criminal and a total p.o.s. he will be buried with honors at Arlington National Cemetery.
Flags across the nation will fly at half-mast. Warmongers and leading Democrats will weep for days. (Hillary, Obama, Schumer, Pelosi, etc.) Anyone on social media platforms who questions McCain’s evil will be censored and purged.
Meanwhile Trump will remain silent, and will be condemned for it.
It's one of the few times I had any respect for Trump!
Yes, liberals will shed more tears than anyone else, especially the Hollywood liberals. You can already see George Clooney and Meryl Streep sobbing.
I feel sorry for Jeremy Corbyn, Konrad, he's a nice guy and I'm sure he is feeling the pressure. He has no support other than from his own followers who do not have power, or status. If you are like Blair and have no soul, or ethics, or morality, you can take the heat, which is because people like Blair are sociopaths.
What happened to the left in the UK? There was once a big left movement here, now 35% to 45% of the population might vote Labour but i don't know if the understand much of politics. With no mainstream media to inform them, they are rudderless. And when Corbyn gets in the elite will destroy his government. They are doing a good job now.
The attack on the embassy in Benghazi was because the CIA was using it as a detention / torture center.
This was disclosed in an interview by the mistress of General David Petraeus, who was cashiered for mishandling classified information. The coverup was a very public crucifixion for the affair, under which the actual disclosure was immediately buried.
I'm wondering if comments like this are enough to get MNE shut down, or if the CIA / NSA will just silence me instead.
Kaivey, Something like 80-90% of newspapers opposed FDR. So what. I think Corbyn can clearly take the heat. Reciting The Masque of Anarchy shows he has what it takes.
Stop believing that the mainstream media and the elite have so much power. Getting people to believe that IS their power.
“The attack on the embassy in Benghazi was because the CIA was using it as a detention / torture center.”
The CIA annex was located a mile from the U.S. embassy. The U.S. government claims that “Ansar al-Sharia” attacked the annex. This is ridiculous, since “Ansar al-Sharia” was a Western-created and supported terrorist group, just like al-Qaeda, plus ISIS™, plus the head-chopping “white helmets.” It’s also ridiculous because the Benghazi area was a U.S. ally.
Someone else in Libya attacked the CIA annex because of its torture programs, and they scored nicely, having eliminated two CIA operatives and wounding ten others.
Bonus: they also eliminated Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
“I'm wondering if comments like this are enough to get MNE shut down, or if the CIA / NSA will just silence me instead.
If this blog became very popular and widely known, then Google would shut it down. Google shut down six blogs yesterday. (Google owns the Blogger platform.)
John McCain has been rotting in that small AZ town for nine months. CBS News says that his evil is “sorely missed” in Washington DC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKMX4lo5aUQ
Incidentally it appears that McCain’s family made the decision to yank the vegetable off life support.
Media pundits are already weeping for their beloved psychopath. Arizona is renaming schools for him. On 11 July 2018 a destroyer was named for him, with an aircraft carrier to follow.
Artists in Arizona are raising $20,000 to fund a public mural to commemorate McCain’s evil, 30 feet tall and 120 feet wide.
Pictures…
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/886499497/the-maverick-and-its-five-cs-a-commemorative-mural?ref=nav_search&result=project&term=The+Maverick+mural
Obama, Joe Biden, and many other neoliberal Democrats plan to attend his funeral.
When the evil vegetable was still conscious, he said he wanted Mike Pence at his funeral, but not Trump.
Nice one, Calgulus, yes, I do despair at the power of the elites, but perhaps there's hope.
Post a Comment