Wednesday, April 22, 2020

CLAIM THAT CORONAVIRUS CAME FROM A LAB IN CHINA COMPLETELY UNFOUNDED, SCIENTISTS SAY

Adam Lauring, an associate professor at the University of Michigan Medical School and an expert in the evolution of viruses, told Newsweek: "This claim is a conspiracy theory and it is not supported at all by the available data."

Citing a study on the origins of the virus published in the journal Nature Medicine, Lauring said: "this analysis of coronavirus genome sequences from patients and from various animals suggests that the virus likely arose in an animal host and then may have undergone further changes once it transmitted and circulated in people.

Newsweek 

15 comments:

Matt Franko said...

Better analysis here:

https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-wuhan-lab-complicated-origins.html

Kaivey said...

Thanks, Matt. I was looking for a better one.

lastgreek said...

K, that was debunked months ago by American virologists and biologists. Nothing but a distraction by the US government.

S400 said...

Good enough for Matt to harp about in another thread.

Matt Franko said...

Can’t get bogged down in only one thread S...

S400 said...

Spreading fake science claims isn’t science other on Trump university. Got your training there?

Matt Franko said...

"fake science claims"

there is no such thing...

There are just fake (false) claims...

You are listening to claims by platonist trained people who are involved in what you are thinking is a 'science discipline'...

You are synthsizing the method and the discipline into one thing..

S400 said...

Lol! Denial! That’s what your mega trained in.

BTW the article you’ve linked to in this thread is also has false claims about security issues at the lab. That was not the case. There were concerns about if some of the staff at the lab had the right competence. Concerns that turned out to be nothing .

Matt Franko said...

look all i see is two parties who self identify as "scientists" in the discipline of "biology" and they are NOT IN AGREEMENT...

If they were BOTH scientists they would NOT EXHIBIT DISAGREEMENT...

Matt Franko said...

"false claims about security issues at the lab. That was not the case. There were concerns about if some of the staff at the lab had the right competence. Concerns that turned out to be nothing ."

How the fuck do you know??? were you fucking there????

Youre completely BIASED pos...

Matt Franko said...

"there were concerns that we didnt evolve from the apes by random chance mutation... but Darwin said in 1860 that was not the case..."

Same f-ing thing you dumb moron asshole...

You and your fellow dumb platonist scrambled eggs for brains disgraced humans maybe should try some Science for a change..

S400 said...

How the fuck do you know???

Because this was years ago and later turned out not to be a problem.

You just link to shit with fake news in it not knowing anything about anything in order to suppprt the orange clowns announcement and then claim yourself “not biased”.

Trump university doctors hat next for you.

S400 said...


"there were concerns that we didnt evolve from the apes by random chance mutation... but Darwin said in 1860 that was not the case..."

Figurative language - art degree envy,

S400 said...

“ were you fucking there????”

The correspondence about it got to public.

S400 said...


"there were concerns that we didnt evolve from the spes by random chance mutation... but Darwin said in 1860 that was not the case..."

Same f-ing thing you dumb moron asshole...”

No It’s not. Today it’s established what that conversation was about and it wasn’t about security issues.

Are you now a wannabe disgrace Platonist human being too?