In the video below, Potholer54 completely demolishes Patrick Moore's arguments. You have to wonder why did Patrick Moore, who is a scientist, had to omit so many facts to make his ideas seem plausible?
Also, Patrick Moore says the Sun is causing some of the global warming, but then he completely omits the role of the Sun when he talks about a previous ice age where Co2 was also very high. Coming from an astronomer, this seems rather odd, so is he stupid, or is he deliberately hiding something? Hmm, but he did say Round-Up was safe to drink, didn't he?
3 comments:
Loved it.
He is co-founder of Greenpeace. He's not a skeptic, on the contrary, he concluded the world is better off Greener and would do better with higher levels of CO2 because he believes in global warming science. In that context, He was worried that scientists were over promising better/warmer climate conditions while under delivering on their forecasts. For example pseudoscientific models used by the political body, IPCC, all run too hot.
Even if your political preference is a lower concentration of CO2, Moore is worth keeping up with periodically because his framing enables you to think about the science outside the Europeans scarcity / austerity ideological model upon which climatism is paradigmatic.
Post a Comment